You mean Reggie Bust? He should be playing arena football. Kevin Faulk is a better Reggie Bush than Reggie Bush is! He is not cut out for the NFL. NFL defenders pull him down with one finger.
2007-12-22 05:15:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
He's good but not the best and he's more like a Marshall Faulk if he was more bulky to maybe take more hits and run up the middle but for now he's still have time to shine but must gain some more bulk to be considered better b/c he just ain't no Barry who was about his size but better but Bush could be good but not the best i the game he'll have to out match Larry Johnson,Maroney, L.T, and others that still be in the NFL in the at least the next 5-6 years and can't see him out dueling them!
2007-12-22 03:35:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Nick B 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
sure he is the best if NFL stands for National Fools League
The best back in the NFL is either LT or Adrian Peterson
2007-12-22 03:05:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by BOOMER SOONER FAN!!! 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Uh...Bush is an average RB...No...L. Tomlinson of the Chargers is the best RB in the NFL
2007-12-22 03:04:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Terry C. 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, he was better last year. He hasn't done much this year. He's a Heisman sissy.
In my opinion Brian Westbrook is the best- but that's just my opinion
2007-12-22 03:50:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Me 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
what r u talking about?
reggie bush is not that great.
2007-12-22 03:58:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
What kind of a question is that? Even real Saints fans know he's a bust.
2007-12-22 02:48:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by ....lo siento 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
He is at best an average player.
2007-12-22 03:01:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by I has a hat 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
not as goood as everyone thinks he is but in colege he was defainantly the best
2007-12-22 06:33:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no hes a pretty bad runnong back but can be good in the slot
2007-12-22 02:48:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋