2007-12-22 02:10:26 · 16 answers · asked by big_poppa2x 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Looking at some of the responses it looks like quite a few people on here slept during school . It is sad that they will be the future leaders, tsk tsk.
Well anyways even if she said she wanted to have sex it is STATUTORY RAPE!!! I can't believe some people can't understand that concept.
If a 13 year old girl and a 40 year old had sex and the girl said she wanted it, it would be STATUTORY RAPE! It basically means that no matter how much the younger individual wanted to engage in sex, they are not old enough to give consent. That is probably the easiest explanation for those who work at a low IQ level.
The bottom line: NO MATTER HOW MUCH SHE CALLS HIM HIS BABY AND TELLS HIM HE LOVES HER, SHE IS NOT OLD ENOUGH TO GIVE LEGAL CONSENT IN SEX!!!!!!!!
P.S. Age of consent in louisiana is 17!
2007-12-22 03:51:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I heard yesterday that it's still up for debate. It depends on a lot of things. Yes, it is statutory rape because she is below the legal age of consent. It depends on what state the act took place and whether or not her parents choose to go after him. The state could seek criminal charges if applicable, but since it's Hollywood, they probably won't, and that's unfortunate because rich and famous people should not be exempt from the law. Spears' people have said that the relationship has been going on for years, and if that's true, the state may choose the file charges because it probably means they've been having sex since she was much younger than 16.
2007-12-22 10:23:06 · answer #2 · answered by Julia D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Haven't they been together for a long time? Which raises some other questions about her parents. And what do you do when two minors are together for a couple of years and one ages out of being a minor before the other? I think everyone knows that she was not raped, so the point is moot.
2007-12-22 10:20:48 · answer #3 · answered by Jen N 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because she is 16. If she was 15, it would be rape, but she is considered old enough to make her choice. Its so stupid. But it IS the law, so... whatever.
I just hope that they actually raise this kid up in a healthy family and not completely turn into the Britney stereotype.
2007-12-22 10:30:06 · answer #4 · answered by Alicia 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OKAY I dont know if this will even really make a difference with the law or anything but Jamie LYnn's boyfriend Casey Aldridge is 18!!! NOT 19!! AND if wasnt entirly his fault Jamie even agreed to have sex!!! SO THE BUTTOM LINE IS CASEY IS 18 NOT 19!!! Got it?! Good.
2007-12-22 12:03:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
The police only really pursuits a case like this if the parents of the girl press charges.
2007-12-22 10:18:00 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think they said he was 18 when he got her pregnant (Jamies about 3 months along)
2007-12-22 10:32:15 · answer #7 · answered by <3 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There was no rape charges because both of them allow each other to have a ***. it is only charge as a rape when only one of them want to have a *** and the other one is being force to have it.. XD
2007-12-22 10:22:05 · answer #8 · answered by CHeMpaKA 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Becuase A. She did it cuse she wanted to and B. tHIS IS hOLLYWOOD.
bUT i tottally agree this should be charged. Cuse i bet there are plenty of other girls who do it with a 19 year old. then the 19 year old is charged.
2007-12-22 11:12:18 · answer #9 · answered by I <3 Johnny's Jimusho! 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Apparently her mother let her live witht the dude.
2007-12-22 10:22:19 · answer #10 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋