So i was watching mike and mike in the morning a few days ago and some guy called in and was like im tired of hearing all this stuff about roger clemens and doing steriods, this is america and you are innocent untill proven guilty so people need to stop saying it until proven. So then Golic asked him so what about Barry Bonds do you think he took them and the guy just paused for a few seconds and then said yea he took them and golic got mad at him, as did i. Did anyone else see this or hear it and if so why is it different for clemens then bonds?
I am a bonds fan myself and i am waiting to hear if either of them did it but i need hard proof not people saying they did it, for either of them
2007-12-20 21:52:11 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Baseball
but im not a big fan of clemens
2007-12-20 21:52:32 · update #1
i did not hear that..but I'm glad golic got mad.so would i.when the focus was on bonds that"innocent to proven guilty"crap was out the window.it was ,read the book...its in there,or look at his stats after a certain age...he's guilty,or look at his head....he must have used.
now ..i don't know if its a race issue or a personality issue,but its making alot of Americans look hypocritical when you hear...lets wait to we hear all the facts...lets not jump to conclusion,or I'm tired of hearing all this crap about steroids...or if he just used to get healthy...its okay.what a bunch of crap.
2007-12-20 22:01:47 · answer #1 · answered by mojo569 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think the reason bonds has been treated differently than clemens was because the media is someone bonds dident treat and the media for the most parts has tired rather hard to paint him in a very negative light so the general public already has a major distaste for him. I was rather susprised how little their was about barry in the mitchell report.
As for hard proof i doubt their ever will be any unless greg anderson testifys saying what he gave barry was HGH.
2007-12-21 03:37:50 · answer #2 · answered by atf666_666 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definite.....Clemens could get the comparable therapy that Bonds gets. it quite is in fact the comparable element so it quite is purely honest. Like Bonds, Clemens broke data in his 40's by potential of steroids/HGH. the only element that concerns me is that if he isn't taken care of like Bonds, it is going to grow to be a great race subject. i could relatively hate to work out that because of the fact it is going to no longer be that way. the only way that folk could hate Bonds greater is as a results of the fact Bonds is an boastful jerk who taken care of the media like crap and grow to be no longer precisely fan friendly thoughout his profession. Beleive me i'm A GIANTS FAN!
2016-11-04 05:07:49 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both Roger Clemens and Barry Bonds are steroid abusers. If you use steroids you are a cheat.
2007-12-21 00:53:34 · answer #4 · answered by Tony R 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is a natural instinct to defend people you like and those that like Clemens will defend him as long as they reasonably can
2007-12-20 22:49:46 · answer #5 · answered by Frizzer 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think they are both equally wrong, but I have lost interest in baseball now and don't care
2007-12-20 21:57:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i agree with you however,who cares if they used steriod ...the clintons inhales,the bushs got dui,obama experiment...who cares about it anymore?
2007-12-20 21:57:17 · answer #7 · answered by Ramesses V 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋