Do you believe we need a new investigation of 911?

Question

If so go to
democrats.com (sorry not sure how to make a hyperlink)
and read their petition.If you start wondering please sign it!
Because I honestly think we need one!

Did any of you morons bother to read the petition?

real patroitic of you og0925go!
Thinking of the good of the nation!

Kirk----Idoubt you even looked...........because I found it without a problem........

Maybe if you actually read the petition with an open mind you would actually LEARN something !!!

Rana-----at least you're honest!Hope you're at least open minded enough to read it and consider what it says.

Answer 1

all bickering and recycled bullsh*t aside.

there are far too many questions surrounding 9/11 and inconsistencies- on top of Bush refusing to provide a transcript of his interview with 9/11 investigators after the incident, after refusing to appear alone, which was their request, suppression of investigation into the bin laden family, exclusive flight privileges to the bin laden family, and conflicting/planted evidence!

***IF ANYONE CAN PROVIDE INFORMATION OR EVEN A RATIONALE INTO WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL THE TAPES THAT WERE CONFISCATED BY THE FBI ON 9/11 I'LL SEND YOU MY NEXT PAYCHECK***

Answer 2

I tried to find the petition you are talking about, but everyone has drooled on it to the point that you can't read it......So enlighten us morons about the point(s) contained in the petition.
To reply to mark a, there were planes, but everyone that knew anything about the......shhhhhhhhhhhh secret plan to take over oil worldwide....shhhhhhhhhhhh were loaded on the planes that flew into the World Trade Center. But please don't tell anyone........the Whac.....oops I mean concerned well meaning Democrats might hear about it.......we can't let that happen now can we.

Edit
What page number? I have looked several times, both using the "next page" link at the bottom, and by looking under petitions.

Answer 3

No.We know the truth and can't do anything about it.Too far gone.Not being a defeatist,just a realist.

Answer 4

Sure, we do!!

But until it happens, here's a couple of things to ponder;

Who flew the planes?

Where did the passengers go?

If there were no planes, who planted the tons of explosives in the buildings, and why didn't anyone notice them doing it. (it would take many days to accomplish, BTW)

The Plane that crashed into Western PA, "they" faked those cell calls to their loved ones, right?

Out of the hundreds of people involved in this (and that is the bare minimum needed) no one has had an attack of conscience, or been drunk and bragged or possibly even had a death bed confession?

When you finally can wrap your head around questions like these, you might realize that another investigation isn't really necessary.

Answer 5

Horse Pucky!

Answer 6

You think the FBI lied in the first one ?

Answer 7

There's no need for a new investigation.

There have been two main investigations, & both have been quite adequate:
=====================
THE 9/11 COMMISSION

This was an independent, bipartisan commission created by CONGRESS in late 2002. It contained BOTH Democrats & Republicans. It's basically an analysis of the terrorist movement & our response to it.

You can find it at
http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm

Since I know of no SPECIFIC problem with this investigation, there's no need to repeat it.
===============================
THE NIST and FEMA INVESTIGATIONS

These are the technical/scientific investigations.

FEMA along with American Society of Civil Engineers, did an extensive analysis of the WTC collapse (ASCE/FEMA World Trade Center Building Performance Study (BPS) Team)
http://www.fema.gov/rebuild/mat/mat_fema403.shtm
It’s useful to see the investigation team & their credentials at: http://www.asce.org/responds/wtc_team.cfm
It's a very impressive list of experts.

NIST investigation consisted of hundreds (yes hundreds) of scientists and industry experts. Some of these are the leading authorities in the world.
http://wtc.nist.gov/

Both of these investigations have been confirmed by numerous published journal articles on the collapse. (See below)

Since I have not yet seen a single SPECIFIC problem with any of these investigations, there is no reason to repeat them.
----------------
===========================
Outside experts confirming the NIST/FEMA investigations:

-- The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057

-- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. See http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/

-- The leading demolition journal in the world is against the conspiracy theorists:
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

-- Purdue (http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html

--Professor Bazant (Northwestern Dept of Civil Engineering) is one of only 14 people to win the Prager Award in engineering. He first described the collapse mechanism as follows: http://www.debunking911.com/ProgressiveCollapseWTC-6-23-2006.pdf

-- Popular Mechanics published a huge article citing 300 renowned experts in demolition & engineering.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

-- Columbia University has permanent seismographic recorders that was running on 9/11 which clearly show no explosives during the collapse of Towers 1 & 2, or of WTC7 . See page 2 of
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

--The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

-- Scientific American. See
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000DA0E2-1E15-128A-9E1583414B7F0000

--------------articles available on-line
“Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation”
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html

“Engineers Explain WTC Collapse”
http://www.architectureweek.com/2002/0529/news_3-1.html

“Twin towers research refutes 9/11 conspiracy theories”
http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/research/story/0,,2166832,00.html

“Report Ties WTC Collapses to Column Failures”
http://enr.construction.com/news/buildings/archives/040119.asp

“It was the fire, caused the twin tower collapse”
http://www.icivilengineer.com/News/WTC/Fire.html

“Simulation for the collapse of WTC after aeroplane impact “
http://www.luxinzheng.net/publications/english_WTC.htm
Lu XZ., Yang N., Jiang JJ. Structure Engineer, 66(sup.). 2003, 18-22

“Elaboration on Aspects of the Postulated Collapse of the World Trade Centre Twin Towers “
HERA: Innovation in Metals. 2001. 13 December 2001.
http://www.hera.org.nz/PDF%20Files/Elaboration%20on%20WTC%20Paper.PDF

Monahan, B.
"World Trade Center Collapse-Civil Engineering Considerations"
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction v. 7, no. 3, (2002): 134-135.
http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PPSCFX000007000003000134000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=Yes

Newland, D.E., & Cebon, D.
"Could the World Trade Center Have Been Modified to Prevent Its Collapse?"
Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 7, (2002):795-800.
http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=JENMDT000128000007000795000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=Yes
====================
PENTAGON TAPES WERE ALL RELEASED

In March of 2002, five frames of video footage from a Pentagon Security camera were released & you can see them here:

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/videos/fiveframes.html

On May 16, 2006, the Department of Defense revealed footage from two video cameras, which you can observe here:

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/videos/dodvideos.html

Footage from the nearby Citgo gas station was released on September 15, 2006, and you can view it here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LJvFjsl6zk

I understand that the video from the Sheraton Hotel really didn’t show anything, but I don’t have a link for it.
---
The blurry image on the tapes is consistent with a 757 and not a missile. A missile, going at twice the speed & being much smaller than a 757, would have made no image at all.

Besides that, we have the jet wreckage & hundreds of eyewitnesses who saw the low-flying plane

Answer 8

Why would we need to invest more time and money into "investigating" 9/11? Investigating what?!?!?

Answer 9

Why bother.

Answer 10

Are you insane, Don't ever forget, but let it go!!!!! We know who did it.