Since it was such a cold day today, how can Democrats still stand behind the Global Warming hoax?

Question

It is about 25 degrees today where I live, colder than I remember it being for quite a long time. with this in mind, how can Democrats still support the hoax of global warming, since it's obvious that the melting ice is not a problem. In fact, looking out my window outside, I can see plenty of ice out there right now.

I know I will get a lot of liberals' hopes down by debunking global warming, since they want it to happen so badly (part of their scheme to turn the USA into a socialist state), and I make no apologies for this, since they are crooks.

Answer 1

They stand by global warming just like they used to stand by global cooling.

Answer 2

You know what gets on my goat?

Moronic people who can't differentiate between the implications of dramatic climatic shifts and a "cold day". One (or two or twenty) cold days don't constitute a refutation of global warming, just like the fact that it's raining today doesn't negate the fact that we're in about the 10th year of continuous drought in Australia... and it looks like continuing.

It's inconceivable to me that people still can't understand that the combined effect of 6 BILLION people can and does have a real effect on the planetary climate systems. How head-in-the-sand can you be?

I suspect that people like you are too comfortable in your modern, high-energy way of life and are unprepared to even consider doing anything that might lower your "comfort level". You obviously have no concern about the billions of other people on the planet who will (or ARE already) being impacted by changes to weather patterns, rainfall and other consequences of our profligate lifestyles.

Maybe you don't have children and maybe you really don't care what happens to future generations. But don't go insulting and abusing people who are trying to do something about a REAL, scientifically verifiable and measurable issue.

Answer 3

My first element would be 'which conspiracy' there are actually this way of excellent form of and deniers seem to function new ones merely approximately on a weekly foundation. the area of technological know-how is 'by ability of and massive' to forget approximately appropriate to the rants of the denier pass, by way of the years they're going to implode under the load of their very own conflicting nonsense. "And with this way of excellent form of tens of millions of folk in on the act, how come none of them have broken ranks and long gone public?" it somewhat is merely like asking the place are even 10% of the 30,000 scientists from the OISM petition, who're all strongly against AGW yet have not shown up at any medical assembly in the final quite a few years. the place are even a million% which would be 3 hundred scientists, a protest on the yearly AGU of three or 4 hundred scientists would make human beings think of, make the media take be conscious. Deniers have tried to describe this by ability of asserting "oh they do no longer % their careers ruined" by ability of the nasty AGW's who get human beings fired" yet cling on, those human beings 'supposedly' have already positioned their names on a petition. 30,000 scientists protesting at an AGU assembly would teach previous doubt the petition isn't fake, yet this has no longer surpassed off (and could on no account ensue) through fact the petition is fake and that i think of even many deniers are initiating to grasp it somewhat is. whether i did no longer artwork in a medical team and had no awareness of technological know-how i'd nevertheless discover it demanding to have self assurance the communities you call who's objectives are ordinarily for the coolest human beings all (NASA, NOAA, EPA) and fairly (Oxfam, pink pass and WHO) are element of this way of stupid pointless conspiracy, fairly given the source of the theories, coming from political time table websites like Heartland or Cato or any of the others who's merely roll seems advertising front adult adult males for industry and acceptable wing politics.

Answer 4

Cold day?
I worked outside all day, didn't even wear a coat. The only thing I had to worry about was the real thick fog. Not something we usually see when it was snowing and raining ice last week.
But then again, we usually don't get that kind of weather for about another month either.

Answer 5

Global means that it is a problem that is happening in all the world, and although that the weather in your town, village or city is cold, that doesn't mean that the rest of the world is ok weather wise.
There are other countries out there, you know.

Answer 6

right... and there is more snow at the top of Mt. Kilimanjaro too.... and the polar ice caps are perfectly intact.

And people don't litter either!

And everyone uses their guns for "hunting and target practice".

And all the aborted fetuses would have been contributing members of society and voted republican!

And the south will rise again!

Answer 7

In 1998 I went deer hunting and a sweatshirt and baseball cap was all I needed to stay warm. It was early December and the high temps were around 60 degrees F. You might have sold me on global warming then.
This year though it was cold. We had a couple days below zero in that time frame.
If global warming was occuring we should be getting warmer and not radically colder like this.

Answer 8

Wow! Your logic is brilliant! Who could dispute the shear magnitude of this well thought out conclusion?

Here is a link that will allow such insightful thinking to benefit mankind as a whole.
http://web.mit.edu/admissions/

So what are your thoughts on this publication concerning Quantum Singularities?
http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=JMAPAQ000048000009092501000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes

Answer 9

Wow! Does that mean that you know more than all the scientists who have been studying temperature trends for decades? And you can tell that from just looking at the temp on ONE day? That's pretty amazing! (amazingly ignorant I mean)

Answer 10

after global warming is 100% proven instead of the current 95% proven - will you all still deny it? you know - like you still deny evolution.

Answer 11

It doesn't matter if the temperature goes up or down it's now called "Global Climate Change". Didn't you get the memo?

It's crazy that global warming is a political issue. It should be a scientific issue. Unfortunately the liberals think the only side of the debate should be their government funded consensus scientist that they march out periodically.

If there was proof it would not be political.