No, but the liberal media has been vastly overestimating the relevance and appeal of this fringe loon
2007-12-20 13:58:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
8⤋
I examine a piece of writing a month or 2 in the past the position the chief of the Libertarian get together suggested they are endorsing Ron Paul for president if he receives the Republican nomination (which potential they received't run all and sundry interior the final election). i imagine they are hoping he will propose their candidate if he fails in his bid. If the Libertarians can get 4.5% of the favourite vote interior the final election it would want to open a sparkling wing in American Politics. shall we've a third get together that would properly be elegible for matching earnings federal elections, and the debates might want to contain 3 activities. Ron Paul , for his section, has suggested that he will invite third get together applicants into the presidential debates if he wins the nomination. this may be large for the folk
2016-10-19 21:47:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. With Democrat front-runners not being able to guarantee troop withdrawal from Iraq by 2013 and not even talking about the looming financial crisis, Ron Paul is the best choice for independents and Democrats. If you are in a closed state make sure to register Republican ASAP to vote for him.
2007-12-20 14:10:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by vox_of_reason2 3
·
4⤊
2⤋
In a IndependentPrimary poll of over 100,000
Dennis Kucinich won by a landslide among Democrats candidates.
Ron Paul won by a landslide among Republican candidates.
Both voted against the illegal invasion of Iraq and the continued funding of the Occupation.
Both have voted against every Corporate-managed "Free Trade" deal thathas resulted in millions of lost American jobs.
No wonder the Corporate media marginalize them both.
2007-12-20 14:13:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Richard V 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
I don't think their underestimating him. He may do ok in New Hampshire, but that's not a sure thing. What is, is he is not a stay're and will be out half way through the primaries.
2007-12-20 14:24:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Robert S 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
The media doesn't want Ron Paul to get attention because Paul won't go along with their big business corruption.
2007-12-20 14:10:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Ron Paul will not exceed 5% in New Hampshire.
2007-12-20 14:04:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Freedom Guy 4
·
2⤊
5⤋
Ron Paul can't and won't win New Hampshire because it's Romney territory. Romney was governor of Massachusetts and given the movement of people from Mass to NH he should win it easily.
2007-12-20 14:07:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by freesince1776 5
·
1⤊
6⤋
why in gods name would a democrat vote for ron paul?
2007-12-20 14:02:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by PD 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Yes.
2007-12-21 06:41:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋