English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I need my tax breaks definately, but healthcare sounds good too. I will definately run for one of the top candidates. Can anyone explain to me the difference.

2007-12-20 13:47:27 · 7 answers · asked by Shelly 2 in Politics & Government Elections

7 answers

Hillary's plan would be a fairly expensive one for the government and for employers. It does not really address the issues of cost when it comes to insurance or pharmaceuticals, saying that costs will come down as technology improves. Personally, I don't really buy that.

Obama's supposedly would cost half as much and would impose regulations on quality and cost when it comes to insurance and pharmaceutical companies. I don't know how effective these regulations would be, but he seems to want to do the right thing.

As for Republicans, I don't know which ones you consider the top candidates (seems to be a five way race) but some of their ideas include expansion of health savings accounts and more preventative care. Those are great ideas, but I think there needs to be more done about the actual costs of health care and the structuring of health insurance.

2007-12-20 13:57:30 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

1

2016-05-28 12:16:45 · answer #2 · answered by Devorah 3 · 0 0

I would vote republican if I were you. Look at Canada and their healthcare system. We would have too few doctors for all the patients and long lines and many would die waiting for treatment. As far as the tax breaks go, Hillary would have none since all her programs proposed are not clearly thought out as to how to pay for them. One example is when she said to set aside $5,000 for every newborn child for education. If you did have a child you would be cheaper paying the $5,000 yourself because in the end it would cost you more then that.

2007-12-20 14:42:57 · answer #3 · answered by Jennifer F 2 · 0 0

Good Question !!! What ever happened to taking "personal responsibility" ? When you get pulled over by a Law Enforcement Officer, "ignorance of the law is NO EXCUSE!" Should a person being charged with Intoxication Manslaughter be able to blame their IGNORANCE on someone else?? I feel the the people that "bought into" the Variable Rate Mortgage, Zero Down, etc., scams are just as guilty as the Lenders/Mortgage Brokers. I feel like the Lenders/Mortgage Brokers should have their license and livelihood taken away - kind of like Bill being impeached and losing his law license. .

2016-05-25 06:04:25 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

When Hillary was first lady, she came up with a plan to socialize medicine. The dramatic change would have plunged us into a deep recession. Thank goodness it didn't go through.

2007-12-20 13:53:34 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. Bodhisattva 6 · 0 0

Government healthcare will be a disaster, prices will soar, longer lines, fewer doctors, just like everywhere else that has socialized healthcare.

Vote freedom first.

2007-12-20 13:57:43 · answer #6 · answered by E. F. Hutton 7 · 0 0

dude, Bush put us into a deep recession any ways.

Obama would probably be a better president than Clinton.
Don't vote for a republican. they give the rich all the tax breaks.

2007-12-20 13:56:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers