Or do you feel they are way over the top?
2007-12-20 11:47:24 · 29 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, she's obviously in panic mode with Obama and Edwards taking her votes.
2007-12-20 12:11:41 · answer #1 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. And if people are not aware to what extreme Candidate Clinton will go they should take notice. I was amazed at the answers I got when I asked this. Another one we both were on I got the royal boot with a slew of Bill Clinton links. It is after years of research I can say with an educated, bias, view this is typical.
http://www.Attacktimeline.com
I just can not see how playing the attack victim helps Hillary '08? Man of the Year Putin will not be so kind. Each World Leader just waiting for the opportunity to cease World power status.
When u can not manage your campaign of 400 or so, your own words, you husband? And poor lil me attacked again.
AND expect to run a country. Add campaign finance & ethics violations just waiting for her.
Over the top?! I expect Bill to freak out again as he watches her tank and sez aloha to going back home.
I believe politicians are always into the mud slinging. She began her own wih Media Matters. A timeline? lol did Bill teach her nothing about leave no paper trail?
I just had a thought and it works. If this is the GOP good job. Hit Clinton where it hurts . Deception & lies politics as usual. She can not answer to any of those charges ! But ABC News broke it as Clinton... and they know much more than me...
edit: is PNAC~ back or am I in a time warp somewhere below?
edit 2: music to my ears hearing the choir now singing
how long did we fight compadre?! never over hill o beans!
It's a Mele Kalikimaka 4 me...
2007-12-20 12:27:29 · answer #2 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
particular. 4 years in the past in the Presidential Election, it is extremely uncomplicated in that subject. I bear in mind some feisty assaults made by Santorum, Gingrich and others for the time of the primaries which i'm particular is going to come again back very quickly. i'm uncertain in case you have been following the information, yet Hillary Clinton nevertheless agreed to artwork with the President after the reality. at latest, he has no longer something yet compliment for this stunning woman, doing a marvelous interest as Secretary of State. What i hit upon exciting in all of this, is the reality that Romney would not seem to have an unique view approximately something, who prefer as a substitute to react to something the President says or does...This tells me one element, he's reactive and a turn flopper. i'm able to't in good ethical experience vote for Romney as President. he alterations his techniques lots too in many circumstances for no good reason aside from appeasing the individuals he happens to be chatting with on the time. I hate that at artwork and that i hate that for the time of a President. in spite of the shown fact that, it is basically my opinion.
2016-11-23 18:30:14 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Barrack Obama strikes me as an overly idealistic wimp full of nothing but cheerleader rhetoric for change with no answers as to how that will be done or what changes he is contemplating, and I hope he doesn't become president until he has experienced some real personal attacks like she has in her life. She hasn't dealt him anything like she has experienced.
He wasn't even in the Senate on 911. How does he know how he would have voted on Iraq if he would have been in DC that day running for cover or had to take Cipro and evacuate due to Anthrax? Do we really need another president who may have fuzzy thinking due to prior substance abuse? I don't see our corrupt government legislating away its meal ticket because Barrak Obama, or any other president says so. I think he should try again in 8 years or so. He hasn't been tested yet in any big ways.
2007-12-20 12:26:57 · answer #4 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They're politicians is what they do. Slander and mudslinging are all part of what makes politics fun and interesting. The 1820s was far more brutal. I don't remember what year this was but when Henry Clay ran as President rumors about him just went crazy. There were even rumors of him committing incest with his daughter! Today's mudslingings are nothing compared to what candidates used to do to each other before.
2007-12-20 12:15:25 · answer #5 · answered by cynical 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't see why everyone is so done on Hillary. She is moving up a tad in the polls and Obama is going down a tad too. She has regained her lead back in New Hampshire(where she is more ahead of Obama than Obama is ahead of her in Iowa) and is about even with Obama in Iowa. Have you checked out polls of some other early states, she has a big double digit lead over Obama with the exception of South Carolina.
2007-12-20 14:25:06 · answer #6 · answered by Michael M 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I predicted ages ago that if Hillary got in trouble that (predictably) the attacks would start. Untrue? Unfair? Of course. They will only get worse.
For all you Obama people, welcome to the world of Clinton opponents. Just ask Newt Gingrich how fair it all is.
2007-12-20 12:00:31 · answer #7 · answered by Michael 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Over the top. Talking about what he wrote in Kindergarten and his past drug use (which he has already readily admitted to) is grasping and looks desperate. These attacks on Obama are basically cheap shots.
2007-12-20 11:56:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Which attacks specificlly? Honestly I think most of them are just normal politics, compared to the things politicians said about eachother in like 1820's and stuff, this is nothing. Andrew Jackson and everyone he knew were basicly made out to be the worst human beings in the world, prostitutes and all kinds of things, and they did it right back. Comparing those to today, we're pretty mild.
2007-12-20 11:52:13 · answer #9 · answered by Shalashaska 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No I do not agree.
I also wish that some attacks could be aimed at Biden and McCain, at least then they would receive media coverage and possibly some "face time" on TV.
It will be a sad day for The USA when these men have to do the Tancredo and bow out.
2007-12-20 11:57:53 · answer #10 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's typical Clinton & Democrat politics.
2007-12-20 13:55:07 · answer #11 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋