...than the scientific community has regarding the threat of global warming - will we be able to classify those who choose to ignore global warming as terrorists and invade?
2007-12-20 10:41:01 · 3 answers · asked by Abel Skivver 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There was an enormous amount intel to justify the invasion of Iraq. Intel came from the followong countries: Britain, Australia, France, Germany, Russia & nermerous other countries- not to mention that he was deliberatly violating UN orders to allow weapons inspectors to inspect various sites.
on the issue of global warming - why did scientists from all over the world meet in Bali - causing enormous amounts of pollution - when now days we have the ability to have global conferences over the internet. Scientists know that there are global climate changes taking place - but those same changes have happened countless time throughout the history of the planet. Scientists thus far have been unable to completely identify what the major cause is and therefore be able to focus upon it
with saying that I believe it is our resposibility to conserve - and do repair whatever enironmental damage has been caused to our planet - yes the human race has caused damage - but we have only begun to learn about our changing planet and to try to make devastating changes all of sudden could make things worse.
the way you worded the questions seems to show that anyone who thinks other wise from your opinion is wrong- why? some of the best solutions to things have come when we question ourselves.
2007-12-20 10:53:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
We didn't invade Iraq. Iraq invaded Kuwait to start this whole thing. Then violated its ceasefire agreement repeatedly.
2007-12-20 18:49:05 · answer #2 · answered by DOOM 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You sir appear to be the tard with this question.
2007-12-20 18:44:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋