2007-12-20 10:36:48 · 7 answers · asked by . 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
ok Mel
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,2170237,00.html
2007-12-20 10:42:02 · update #1
Should the members of a family, vote, on whether they want an outsider to come in their house, rape some of the members, steal the family jewels and stay as long as he wants?
The answer is "no". Why?
Because the members would normally vote "no". They would not want to be occupied and robed.
They would vote "yes", (they want to be occupied and robed), only, if they are under on, an unacceptable pressure to vote "yes", or, if they are unable to understand the question due to insanity or mental retardation.
A "yes", vote for occupation and theft, could not reasonably be accepted as valid.
Because, only a "NO" could be accepted as valid, a referendum is useless.
2007-12-20 15:31:03 · answer #1 · answered by johnfarber2000 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What contracts for oil have the US forces written, and be specific.
Balls, you type just do not give up. The US has not even taken a drop of oil from Iraq that has not been paid for.
2007-12-20 18:42:49 · answer #2 · answered by Jeff L 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
They already did that. And we don't use Iraqi oil. Too much sulfur.
2007-12-20 18:40:09 · answer #3 · answered by DOOM 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
yes
2007-12-20 18:48:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Why do you think we are over there now? They are idiots who only want to kill each other in the name of Allah.
2007-12-20 18:40:52 · answer #5 · answered by midnitrondavu 5 · 0⤊ 5⤋
They have already said they don't want them to leave yet!
2007-12-20 18:41:08 · answer #6 · answered by question212 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Please prove the war has anything to do with oil. i have yet to get one true proof. only accusations.
2007-12-20 18:39:48 · answer #7 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋