2007-12-20 09:36:02 · 9 answers · asked by b n r 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
i dont think he has a horrible voice.. his voice is different and unique from everything you hear every day... the same old kinda voices and his unique voice matches his wonderful unique lyrics...
2007-12-20 10:01:12 · answer #1 · answered by singing4gsus 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually, his voice wasn't all that bad in his early years. Listen to Lay Lady Lay. Most of his work was done in an adopted accent that he thought was important to the delivery of his songs. He never claimed to be anything more than a balladeer.
2007-12-20 17:45:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Eh, it's all on perspective.
I think he has a wonderful voice that complements most of his songs perfectly.
Listen to Visions of Johanna.
He sounds rusty and untrained, and it's beautiful.
Would it really be that great if it were sung by someone conventional?
2007-12-20 18:18:52 · answer #3 · answered by SHARON 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe is beautiful to me and horrible to you.
The majority of the things in life are completely relative.
2007-12-20 18:07:14 · answer #4 · answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
heres to cisco and sonny and leadbelly too,
and to all the good people who've traveled with you,
heres to the hearts and the hands of the men,
that come with the dust and are gone with the wind.
dylan is god!
2007-12-20 18:30:09 · answer #5 · answered by Ramble 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
? He can sing a tune, he doesn't have the best range, but he is one of the best lyricists of all time so I don't think he's got too much to fret about.
2007-12-20 17:40:20 · answer #6 · answered by Jett 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He doesn't. He's just not great as a vocalist when compared to some.
2007-12-20 17:46:19 · answer #7 · answered by livemoreamply 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ha 'cause he was born with it
2007-12-20 17:39:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
it matches his looks
2007-12-20 17:46:10 · answer #9 · answered by thanks to our brave troops, 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋