English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why?

2007-12-20 09:22:45 · 14 answers · asked by civil_av8r 7 in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

What I am for is a better educational system that will help us compete against the rest of the world, This country lags so far in Mathematics compared to most countries of the world. And one problem might be is because there is a problem with reading. I used to be a substitute teacher and I saw so many absurd mistakes in mathematics that this must be why.

2007-12-21 13:20:24 · answer #1 · answered by Michael M 6 · 0 0

Nationalized Pre-K is a way to 1) beef up the teachers unions and 2) take more money from tax payers and 3) indoctrinate children sooner into the ultra liberal pap that is preached in many of the nation's school districts. Oh, and number 4) to increase the public dependancy on government.

2007-12-20 17:30:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No/Against: Pre-school should be Parental choice. children are Not Property of the State.

2007-12-20 17:27:43 · answer #3 · answered by Stormchaser 5 · 3 1

Against! Since we can't get public schools to teach kids now, how will adding another year and hundreds of millions of dollars help. Nationalized anything is sub par.

2007-12-20 17:27:46 · answer #4 · answered by blissdds 4 · 3 1

Against. Parents should have a choice with children that young. I don't believe it takes a village. It takes parents.
This is just another means to achieve Hillary's socialistic agenda.

2007-12-20 17:31:03 · answer #5 · answered by amazin'g 7 · 0 1

I think it should be mandated to be available to anyone who wants it by the feds.. but that it should be regulated on a state level.


The simple fact is that Pre-K is the most effective way to improve the level of education in this nation. We have state funded Pre-K to all who choose to attend Pre-K in our state. It works just fine and has shown unbelievable promise.

2007-12-20 17:30:45 · answer #6 · answered by pip 7 · 0 3

Against. Because we don't need it. Pre-K is just another way to waste your tax dollars and liberalize your children in government training camps.

2007-12-20 17:25:50 · answer #7 · answered by Curtis 6 · 4 2

It’s sad when teachers promote anti-capitalism and pro-liberalism views on their students. Not surprising that 99 cents out of every dollar donated to Congress is given to the Democrat party. So many students trust teachers as being honest, but instead are promoting their political agenda on young gullible students

American Federation of Teachers
The American Federation of Teachers represents 1 million teachers, school staff, higher education faculty and other public employees. As one of the leading education groups on Capitol Hill, the federation lobbied heavily on President Bush’s education plan, beating back attempts to attach pro-voucher amendments.

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.asp?ID=D000000083&Name=American+Federation+of+Teachers

2007-12-20 17:55:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

against, waste of revenue, The US government is not a day care

2007-12-20 17:41:51 · answer #9 · answered by a person of interest 5 · 0 1

It's a waste. It's just another way to have the government raise our kids so we don't have to.

2007-12-20 17:31:31 · answer #10 · answered by mbush40 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers