I'm just an average size 10, so am not 100% sure. Just curious.
2007-12-20 08:57:50 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
Has anyone ever figured out if the PP size relates to the size of the brain?
Cause it sure seems to relate to the IQ level!
2007-12-20 09:37:22 · answer #1 · answered by Ella 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Does not matter.
I dated a very large and tall man with a 13.5 shoe size.
His peeper was very "average" sized....even a tad on the short side LOL!
Ha ha in retrospect, he was always self conscious about it but I always told him it was fine. Dang I should have spilled the beans once I broke it off LOL!!!!!!!
2007-12-20 09:02:59 · answer #2 · answered by kittykatsback 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My 18 365 days old daughter has been in length 6 (British) considering that she grow to be around 13 years of age yet she is purely 5ft. 3ins tall. My 25 365 days old daughter is in a length 4 often times 5 & she is an inch or so taller than her sister. whilst i grow to be 13 years of age i grow to be in a length 2 & i grow to be 5ft. 9in. tall yet I had to have my ft surgically lengthened using a sort of club foot condition. i do no longer think of ft length has something to do with top or if it has then my kin is an exception to that rule lol x
2016-11-04 03:58:57 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe it isn't shoe size, my ding a ling is the same length when erect as the distance from my wrist to the tip of my middle finger, so check that. lol.
2007-12-20 11:34:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hand size thumb to pinkie> Mines 8" from tip to tip
2007-12-20 09:12:33 · answer #5 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah right. It has nothing at all to do with pen!s size. My feet are relatively small but my pen!s is extremely thick. Go figure.
2007-12-20 09:20:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No shoe size has nothing to do with p size.. Sorry!
2007-12-20 09:13:30 · answer #7 · answered by -Less- 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seems to me the hand size tells more.
2007-12-20 09:13:20 · answer #8 · answered by nonameblonde 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a GENERAL statement....
Bigger (taller) men tend to have bigger everything. Hence, a guy with bigger feet, arms, legs, body, is likely to have a bigger wang. It's purely proportions.
However, there is NO correlation to shoe size when height is held constant. i.e. two guys, each 5'10, different size feet, same chances if they are big "elsewhere".
2007-12-20 09:33:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Scientifically, shoe size means nothing. Just another old wife's tale. It's amazing what kids'll ask.
2007-12-20 09:02:21 · answer #10 · answered by Jazmin S 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋