He fits the descrpition of the anti christ in every way... The Mayan calendar ends in 2012 and if this guy becomes president all the stupid people in America including Oprah can take their money and shove it up their @$$ses because it will be useless under arab rule (their will be no more fashion ladies) western culture will die off...If you vote for this guy, you are making Osama Bin Laden and the Middle East very happy... Check out some of Nostradamus's predictions... United States will equal United Arab Emirates in 2009 - ?
If I offend anyone sorry, but I care about my country and my future a little more than a Obama suporters feelings...
Do some research on Nostradamus and Obama before voting for this guy
2007-12-20 08:34:51 · 24 answers · asked by Keith Y 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
His father was muslim and his mother was atheist... He claims to be a christian, but the apple doesn't fall far from the tree... He went to Muslim School, and he fits the desciption of the anitchrist Antichrist's rise to power in Middle East
(Century II, Quatrains 23 and 81)
The Antichrist will take over Iran by using a human decoy to trick the Iranian Ayatollah in power. This will involve the "yes men" and puppets of the Ayatollah's court. The Antichrist will first drive away internal supporters of the Ayatollah by starting a civil war. Then he will put forth a man as a leader, a man for Iranians loyal to the Ayatollah to concentrate their hate on. The man will be assassinated while Iran is being taken over, and his opponents will think they have foiled the overthrow of power by assassinating him. But they will find out later he was merely a decoy and that they played into the plans of the Antichrist.
The Antichrist will obtain power in his own sphere, Asia & Middle East
2007-12-20 08:54:10 · update #1
As he grows out of this arena, and into Europe, the next step will be into the Mediterranean, his area of strength. Because of his Middle Eastern heritage he will have already united North Africans, who are sympathetic to his cultural background, with his Asian and Middle Eastern conglomerate.
2007-12-20 08:56:21 · update #2
I am a Republican by the way... I dislike Hillary just as much as Obama...
I am against socialism and hate how she can never come to a decision for any issue... Biden is the only qualified democratic candidate
2007-12-20 09:00:48 · update #3
I would like for you to take your own advice and do some research into Obama. You should also do some research into the power the President is granted. If you think that the US President would have the power to transform a country into Arabian Rule you really need to check the source of your education.
2007-12-20 08:50:51 · answer #1 · answered by labken1817 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm certainly willing to consider your side of the story, but based on your question, I don't think I understand it...
In what ways does he fit the description of the Anti Christ?
How would his presidency be any different than anyone else's, in consideration of the Mayan calendar, or Nostradamus' predictions? These two items both reflect "what the future will hold", so it seems to me that whomever we elect as president will be the one who takes us to that place in time.
What connection do you see between Barack Obama and Osama Bin Laden (besides the sound of his name)?
Why do you believe he would lead us under Arab rule? He's Christian, not Muslim, so you're gonna need to provide a pretty convincing argument on this one.
I'm not offended by your post, except for the fact that it doesn't say anything, and doesn't help any of us in making an intelligent decision come election day. I'll be sure to check back to see if you add any details that will actually help. Thanks for caring enough to enlighten the rest of us!
2007-12-20 08:49:42 · answer #2 · answered by abfabmom1 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I like how you say Hussein, and I enjoyed how all of the anti-obama voters out there prey on that name to compare him to Saddam. This is nothing more than just a pathetic attempt to stir U.S. citizens into voting against Obama.
Please everyone, just do me a favor and do your own research on the presidency - and don't take advice from others (kinda tampers with the votes if you will).
BTW, I'm voting for Stephen Colbert, write in vote.
-Matt
2007-12-20 19:00:22 · answer #3 · answered by sabremkii 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are a lot of ignorant voters in our midst. I a pro freedom and the right to vote, but the entire country should have to take an IQ test before voting. People vote based on their own self interest, rather than for the greater good of the country as a whole.
2007-12-20 08:43:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Nostradamus...that is funny. You have to have one heck of an imagination to believe that he was accurate.
On the other hand, there are a few who have claimed that Obama is anti-Christ. I do not believe it, but their arguments are compelling.
I would not vote for Obama simply because the very fact that he stated that he would never under any circumstances resort to the use of nuclear weapons. The threat of nuclear weapons has always been a great deterrant against our enemies. To take that off the table is probably the single most ridiculous thing any presidential hopeful could say or do.
2007-12-20 08:41:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Are u sure he is half Black and not half White? That been said, then America is voting for the half white of Barrack to be President for a not so half white Nation U.S.A.
2016-05-25 05:06:02 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think you need to drink less coffee and take a few calming meds.. Americans will vote for anyone else to see the Hillar-beast does not get in to office..
anti-christ that's a good one. and Nostradamus has not been right about much in a clear sense. you can always find an event in the past to fit a quatrain
2007-12-20 08:47:42 · answer #7 · answered by IHATETHEEUSKI 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Someone could put a gun to my head and try to threaten me to vote for him....they'd just have to shoot me. NO WAY would I EVER vote for that moron, NEVER. I'd never vote for Hillary either. I want to see this country IMPROVE BACK TO THE AMERICAN WAY, instead of deteriorate into the nations way! No amnesty for anyone, the laws are the laws, illegals have already committed felonies when they came here illegally, and Obama supports them. Wonder why? What's in his backround? Exactly. America needs a good cleaning up, and we need a "Mr. Clean" in office.
2007-12-20 13:42:44 · answer #8 · answered by Wutz it worth 2 ya? 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm voting for Hillary, but I find what you're saying to be nonsensical, unintelligent and offensive. Nostradamus made thousands of predictions, most of them off-the-wall, some of them so general that they could be fit into almost any scenario that would have happened, and a tiny percentage that actually came true. Do you believe in the tooth fairy too?
2007-12-20 08:45:13 · answer #9 · answered by Stephen L 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well, its interesting, I've heard this argument about Obama before, but I read an article Andrew Sullivan, who is a conservative writer wrote, and I don't agree with some of it but he does make an interesting point about Obama and the War on Terror.
"How has a black, urban liberal gained far stronger support among Republicans than the made-over moderate Clinton or the southern charmer Edwards? Perhaps because the Republicans and independents who are open to an Obama candidacy see his primary advantage in prosecuting the war on Islamist terrorism. It isn’t about his policies as such; it is about his person. They are prepared to set their own ideological preferences to one side in favor of what Obama offers America in a critical moment in our dealings with the rest of the world. The war today matters enormously...hat does he offer? First and foremost: his face. Think of it as the most effective potential re-branding of the United States since Reagan. Such a re-branding is not trivial—it’s central to an effective war strategy. The war on Islamist terror, after all, is two-pronged: a function of both hard power and soft power. We have seen the potential of hard power in removing the Taliban and Saddam Hussein. We have also seen its inherent weaknesses in Iraq, and its profound limitations in winning a long war against radical Islam. The next president has to create a sophisticated and supple blend of soft and hard power to isolate the enemy, to fight where necessary, but also to create an ideological template that works to the West’s advantage over the long haul. There is simply no other candidate with the potential of Obama to do this. Which is where his face comes in.
Consider this hypothetical. It’s November 2008. A young Pakistani Muslim is watching television and sees that this man—Barack Hussein Obama—is the new face of America. In one simple image, America’s soft power has been ratcheted up not a notch, but a logarithm. A brown-skinned man whose father was an African, who grew up in Indonesia and Hawaii, who attended a majority-Muslim school as a boy, is now the alleged enemy. If you wanted the crudest but most effective weapon against the demonization of America that fuels Islamist ideology, Obama’s face gets close. It proves them wrong about what America is in ways no words can.
The other obvious advantage that Obama has in facing the world and our enemies is his record on the Iraq War. He is the only major candidate to have clearly opposed it from the start. Whoever is in office in January 2009 will be tasked with redeploying forces in and out of Iraq, negotiating with neighboring states, engaging America’s estranged allies, tamping down regional violence. Obama’s interlocutors in Iraq and the Middle East would know that he never had suspicious motives toward Iraq, has no interest in occupying it indefinitely, and foresaw more clearly than most Americans the baleful consequences of long-term occupation."
2007-12-20 08:41:40 · answer #10 · answered by Political Analyst 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋