What are your thoughts on this question? Please look at the link and read the persons additional details. Seems to me he/she is insinuating lesbians are worthless because they are not reproducing.
"Is lesbian sex as good as heterosexual sex?"
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ak7fSmhYLTgXjLAEAyEjxG5IzKIX;_ylv=3?qid=20071220130109AAzXjYN
2007-12-20 08:10:49 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
This poster is a total misogynist and is always posting offensive questions - one recently was 'can a woman castrate a man when he is having sex with her because a part of his body is in her body' I replied 'a woman having sex with you might want to try'.
He is just a toal loser
2007-12-20 08:16:03 · answer #1 · answered by Ellesar 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
No I think she might be saying that lesbian and gay sex, while feeling really good to those types of people is worthless. Not the lesbian herself. I think she's trying to say, why bother having sex if it isn't to reproduce. Leads one to believe her sex life isn't very good. I am a woman married to a man and we chose not to have children and prevent it. The fact that the couples mentioned are the same sex, also prevents them from having children. Would the sex still feel good even if there is no intention to have children? And those women who are physcially unable to have children, if they have sex, it may be great, but it won't produce anything. Wouldn't that be the same if sex is sex, going on a purely instinctual level? it is the normal to have and want sex. In primal terms, we have sex to procreate, but not humans or dolphins. We have sex for fun. Um, I'm I going a little off topic here, have I lost sight of the question? Not really sure.
2007-12-20 16:21:03 · answer #2 · answered by The Cat 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Short answer YES. It is like asking is GAY sex as good as heterosexual sex? Sex is sex no matter how you do it. Now the usefulness of sex is a totally different issue. If you are referring to the usefulness of sex to procreate then yes a Lesbian or Gay Guy's idea of sex is worthless. It does not procreate. But if the reference is to "personal satisfaction" of one type of sex over the other, well, now you have jumped to another circle. The answer there is all up to the couple that is doing it. If they get "personal satisfaction" of having gay sexual relations and care less about procreation then I would tend to say "whatever makes them tick tock". You see worthless is a relative word. Worthless as opposed to what?
2007-12-20 16:20:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well if anyone insults lesbians or even gay men for that matter, because they don't reproduce, should stop having sex themselves!
I say that because not all straight people have sex to reproduce!
SO ALL YOU STRAIGHT PEOPLE OUT THERE BETTER STOP HAVING SEX UNLESS YOU PLAN TO HAVE A BABY!!!!
But anyway, there is nothing wrong with being gay or lesbian. I say this because love is never wrong! There is nothing wrong with two people being together who really love and care about each other!
You tell this person that if procreation is such an issue, and it's important for people to reproduce, let them find a solution to the overpopulation problem that we face today!!!!!
2007-12-20 16:22:18 · answer #4 · answered by James Boroznoff 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Just because you are a lesbian don't mean you are worthless! You are a person and you mean something wonderful to someone. That is all that matters. And if you wanted children you can adopt and that sometimes is better than having your own child. Because you give a child a chance that normally would not have one.
2007-12-20 16:16:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
who cares what others say about your orientation, only you and your partner know the answer. Although I may not agree with the lifestyle no one has the right to say someone is worthless. I can't reproduce and I am worthy and have plenty of worth. You may or may not believe this but God made every human with worth. So keep your worthy chin up and stay confident about who you are. : )
2007-12-20 16:17:32 · answer #6 · answered by Execusuite 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This is pretty much standard sexist propaganda. That women's sole purpose is to produce children. This COULD be turned around to say that men's sole purpose is to provide sperm and as that one man can impregnate multiple women, men are FAR less important. That's pretty much the logical extension of the reproduction argument. I'm guessing most men wouldn't want to be weeded out according to that argument.
2007-12-20 16:28:13 · answer #7 · answered by Jessica M 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It sounds as if the chance of getting pregnant enhances the orgasm, but just the opposite is true for most young girls, who don't want the burden of being a full time baby sitter.
2007-12-20 16:19:31 · answer #8 · answered by sparks 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yup. That is what he is saying. He says it doesn't reproduce and hints at a religious shame on you for doing something only because it feels good.
My thoughts? The world is over populated, we could use a hell of a lot more gay people being themselves and we still wont die off. People should just be themselves....
2007-12-20 16:18:15 · answer #9 · answered by JuanB 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
why worthless?? that means that a woman who has a 10 children is better than another who has 9? come on!...we are in the 21st century!
2007-12-20 16:32:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋