2007-12-20 07:56:36 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
That is a very interesting proposal you have there. I think if you need to be drug tested to be in the military - and since as president you are Commander-in-Chief - they should not be exempt.
2007-12-20 08:06:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously, nobody drug tested any of the candidates during the last two (or four) elections. What's the basis of your argument, if not precedence?
Seriously, we went through 8 years of Bill "I didn't inhale" and 8 more years of George the cokehead. Unless the next president is on heroin, I doubt it will make a difference.
2007-12-20 17:56:11 · answer #2 · answered by badkitty1969 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course. Nothing like little public outcry that we violate the constitution.
2007-12-20 16:03:42 · answer #3 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
For what?
Performance enhancing drugs?
2007-12-20 16:15:09 · answer #4 · answered by benni 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes, I am pretty sure the current administration is addicted to stupid pills
2007-12-20 16:05:17 · answer #5 · answered by mrrosema 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't care.
2007-12-20 16:03:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If they should be then we all should be.
2007-12-20 16:05:17 · answer #7 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
for why?
2007-12-20 15:59:10 · answer #8 · answered by jack spicer 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋