Talking about "before" the Big Bang is as meaningless about talking about objects "outside" the universe. At the moment of the Big Bang, all of the energy in our universe was present.
2007-12-20 07:49:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Beetle in a Box 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
You're assuming that there was nothing before the big bang. I'll give one idea that I've heard often. Several ideas center around the possibility that the big bang was the end result of a previous universe. Think of it like a balloon. The brand new balloon is the beginning. You blow it up, and you have the universe at midpoint along it's timeline. As it slowly deflates, you goes back to the point it was at when you first got it. So you blow it up again. It deflates again. You blow it up again, it deflates again. That particular idea places the universe on a never ending cycle, with the big bang as the starting and ending point.
I know that sounds a bit odd, because it had to start somewhere. That's part of the problem with that idea. Heck, that's one of the problems with most ideas regarding how it started. We don't have the necessary evidence yet. Hopefully, someday we will. For now, all we can do is run simulations and determine what possible scenarios can result in a big bang like event.
Other ideas say that it started because of a build up of pure energy. But where did the energy come from? I've heard an idea once that a random event put in motion the conditions needed for a big bang. Again, what event and where did that event come from.
However, for the above comment that this doesn't belong in the science category and should be in religion, I'd disagree. It would be well suited in both if the person was trying to get answers from both sides of the debate, or if you were trying to take something scientific you had heard about the Big Bang and try to get answers to explain it better.
2007-12-20 09:42:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by TripCyclone 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
If nothing existed before the Big Bang, then where did the "creator" come from?
2007-12-21 07:28:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Everything in the universe existed before the big bang. It was just in highly compacted form. When it blew apart, it distributed matter throughout the universe.
Eventually, the universe will collapse upon itself again creating another cosmic egg which will again blow apart and the cycle will start all over again.
2007-12-20 07:50:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Joe B. 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Theroy? Isn't that someones name?
A creator cannot be subjected to the scientific method. Therefore your argument is moot.
I believe in a creator. I also believe in some common sense.
2007-12-20 07:54:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lady Geologist 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
"in the previous the huge Bang no longer something existed" - nicely, it is nicely incorrect. all the ability of the full universe existed in an extremely compressed, tiny quantity. of direction you could no longer create something from no longer something - technology does not say it did.
2016-12-18 05:47:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only thing that adds up to zero here is the chance that you will actually ask an intelligent question.
2007-12-21 07:08:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mark S, JPAA 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
interesting god botherer cod-science .
There is no equation defining big bag theory so your statement is nonsense, post it in the religous section where it belongs, or even better, as its not even a question why not just stop wasting the internets capacity.
2007-12-20 07:49:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋