Or is that how they plan to lose in 2008?
2007-12-20 06:36:21 · 14 answers · asked by How Big is Your Govt Check 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It is one of the Dems' top weaknesses. But, they continue to hammer themselves over and over and over by coming off as being on the side of terrorists.
2007-12-20 06:39:47 · update #1
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/bush.briefing/
Bush is a big protector of terrorists. He never pursued bin Laden, either before the attacks, when he had the warnings in his hand, or afterwards, when Halliburton told him to go to Iraq to free that oil for their profits.
NeoCons refuse to believe the media, yet believe every word of their chain emails. Go figure.
2007-12-20 06:48:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It is an awe striking display of propaganda on the part of a few billionaire media owners to brand half the nation as traitors responsible for the hardship in Iraq
Even though an overwhelming amount of Americans want the troops out of Iraq and a tiny minority still supprt Bush -
The media has managed to convince millions the enemy is half the nation
Wow - just wow and the most impressive is that the majority don't see themeleves as being lead down the garden path
2007-12-20 06:49:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dems won't lose the election. Bush has pretty much guaranteed that. Dems don't want to protect terrorists but most of them do believe that if a person is incarcerated, they deserve to know what they're being charged with and given legal representation. Isn't there a saying "Innocent until proven guilty"? I'm sure there are plenty at Gitmo who are guilty but I'm just as sure there are plenty who were in the wrong place at the wrong time.
2007-12-20 06:41:18 · answer #3 · answered by katydid 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Did you know President Bush got an intelligence report that forecast the 9-11 attacks on Aug. 8, 2001, and then went on vacation to his ranch in Texas for a whole month without even reading it. Did you know he recently cut funding for anti terrorism here in the US. Why would he do that? Seriously, think hard, why, what rational reason would a person have for doing that. You will come to a rather frightening answer, and that blows your "protect terrorism" argument out of the toilet.
2007-12-20 06:44:55 · answer #4 · answered by jxt299 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Do sanctuary cities strike a familiar note?
Does the idea of GITMO closing down and bringing people who have been caught doing horrendous things, and bringing them here, to America where they may have access to our legal system?
If you ask them they would sanction bringing terrorists to our neighborhoods. To embrace them with warmth and love, and the ACLU.
I do hope there are many soldiers, their families and many others who realize these criminals should stay right where they are and not a threat on our shores.
I cannot speak for those who would protect terrorists, like the ones who beheaded Daniel Pearle, and have done atrocious things to Americans, American soldiers and the Iraqi people.
I haven't forgotten 9/11 and many other families haven't either. The plot to destroy us is still out there. We need to continue to increase security, and efforts to obtain information and detain those who would hurt, torture and kill any of us!
Edit: Charzb: You have it right!
.
2007-12-20 06:51:49 · answer #5 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I am ASSuming that you are talking about the 35% who still believe that the current Administration can do no wrong - it is a popular belief among the neo-cons that the Democrats want to protect Terrorist. Of course, the are totally wrong but you will never be able to change their warped minds.
2007-12-20 06:42:43 · answer #6 · answered by Becca 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Where is your evidence that proves millions of Americans Believe this? You don't have any because it is a bald face lie and you know it. Flaming dittohead trolls are in fine form today.
2007-12-20 06:50:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
All Democratic coverage, ethical values and ideology, have as their root, particular lies. All Democrat rhetoric is purely used as justification for those particular lies. The occasion of the unfavorable is out to make as many unfavorable human beings because it may. the main suitable thank you to make unfavorable human beings is to enhance taxes. No Democrat has ever made any speech the place they did no longer recommend bigger taxes on the wealthy. whilst the wealthy are taxed, they by no potential stay in smaller residences. They make their workers artwork greater durable for much less, they make their shareholders earn much less on investments and that they make their purchasers pay greater for much less. The Democrats are for all issues that are immoral. (till a Republican does it.) They seek for to reason envy and, hatred. They seek for to reason poverty and distress. They seek for to reason decrease ethical values. All this would't be by potential of twist of destiny. i think it quite is coordinated and planned by potential of the father of all lies. this is extremely worry-free to work out God's hand in this international. this is greater durable to work out the artwork of the father of all lies. it is going to show itself as a lie.
2016-11-04 03:40:37 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
republican bush is the one that stood by and did nothing as terrorists attacked the US on 9/11.
he's also the one that let usama escape at tora bora
2007-12-20 06:52:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well, I haven't seen that survey but from what I can see, its true. Dems want to abolish the Patriot Act, Guantanamo, and any form of protection for the citizens of this country. They want to obliterate the CIA and deny any form of governmental intelligence. They want to pull out of Iraq and let it be taken over by terrorists.
I haven't seen one shred of evidence to dispute this theory.
2007-12-20 06:47:29 · answer #10 · answered by Charzb 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋