English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

25 answers

definitely not. not to point any fingers, but because of his choices and actions, we went to war with Iraq (when we should have been trying to make peace with this unwelcoming country), we now have the No Child Left Behind program (which i have to say is obviously not helping our children's education), and we are now enemies with at least 3 foreign countries. in my opinion, the U.S. is in worse shape today than before Bush became President. it might not all be his fault entirely, but our country is not doing too well anymore.

2007-12-20 07:50:07 · answer #1 · answered by More Dead But More Alive 5 · 3 1

Big corporations have done better during Bush's reign because of tax cuts and there has been an overall increase in their percentage in profits. However, I do feel there was something during Clinton years that it just felt more prosperous among the average fellow american. You could make decent money, gas was not that expensive and prices were not climbing as fast as they are now. Human services and health programs had bigger budgets to help people that truly needed it. For example the WIC program does not give out as much milk, cheese, juice , etc as it use to however the need of low-income families has not changed they just have to do with less.

2007-12-20 13:54:36 · answer #2 · answered by Unblindisback 3 · 7 1

HELL NO!!!! WE ARE AT MORE OF A RISK FOR A TERRORIST ATTACK THEN WE WERE PRIOR TO 9-11....I am sorry to say but Bush and Dick Royally F this country up and its going to take along time to fix the damage done!!

2007-12-20 13:52:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 8 1

Defiantly not. Just look at what's happened to the dollar.

2007-12-20 15:08:58 · answer #4 · answered by Priscilla B 5 · 5 1

Yes

2007-12-20 13:46:28 · answer #5 · answered by fsfa 6 · 3 9

NO

Did you need to ask?

We need Clinton back with- ""its the economy stupid"".

2007-12-20 15:12:20 · answer #6 · answered by professorc 7 · 5 1

Yes,

2007-12-20 13:52:09 · answer #7 · answered by David_the_Great 7 · 4 7

Yes.

2007-12-20 13:50:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 7

not in general or in any specific way, shape or form.

2007-12-20 13:47:54 · answer #9 · answered by Alan S 7 · 6 3

no, not at all. it's worse, to be clear. much worse.

2007-12-20 16:29:56 · answer #10 · answered by Who's sarcastic? 6 · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers