2007-12-20 05:16:48 · 22 answers · asked by jeffwey m 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I would guess that if they were in Syria we would have invaded them by now....then again, Syria doesn't have much oil output so who cares?
2007-12-20 05:24:10 · answer #1 · answered by boxjellÿ 5 · 4⤊ 7⤋
The Vice Air Marshal under Saddam has researched and written in considerable detail what happened to them. He wrote a book called "Saddam's Secrets". You should check it out.
Republicans (especially military types) are not embarrassed about this question because our memory is greater than 6 years.
I personally have anthrax in my blood because the commander in chief ordered me to be immunized before deployment. (That was Clinton, of course, and he not only believed Saddam had WMDs, he claimed to know which ones and considered the intelligence actionable enough to take material steps in defense of them.)
My question to you is whether you're smart enough to figure out the two-faced answers liberals and democrats are giving you when asked by this? They always give the answers that liberals want, the question in my mind is why are liberals so easy to dupe?
2007-12-20 05:31:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Do a quick search on who voted for the resolution to authorize force in Iraq.
Just take a look at all the candidates that voted for going into Iraq, with guns a-blazin, and see how many voted against it.
At THE TIME, it was largely accepted in America to go into Iraq. largely accepted.
But feel free to spout off at the mouth about lookign back....hindsight is 20/20
2007-12-20 06:12:09 · answer #3 · answered by Phil M 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Some were found though depleted, most of the suspicion comes from the fact that Saddam was bluffing Iran and got called out.
2007-12-20 05:43:34 · answer #4 · answered by mbush40 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, not at all. It's an easy question to ignore, for intelligent people. Trying to "blame" Bush for the situation in Iraq just doesn't fly. It's the only arrow in the liberal quivver, however.
2007-12-20 05:34:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Do Democrats hate when the question is asked"
Why didn't Clinton take Osama Bin Ladin into custody in 1998 when Sudan Offered him... and he was on the FBI most wanted list?
2007-12-20 05:36:22 · answer #6 · answered by garyb1616 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'll answer it for you. They used chlorine bombs while I was over there earlier this year. That's where at least two of the weapons of mass destruction were. In Baghdad.
2007-12-20 05:23:14 · answer #7 · answered by DOOM 7 · 8⤊ 3⤋
Nope.
2007-12-20 05:35:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's pretty amusing all the Democrats are giving Phillip thumbs-down. YOUR leaders said these things folks!!!
2007-12-20 05:26:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
No, I LOVE that question so much, I've posted the answer in my profile!
2007-12-20 05:31:37 · answer #10 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't hate that question. We found plenty of chemical weapons.
2007-12-20 05:22:48 · answer #11 · answered by Abu#2 4 · 9⤊ 2⤋