Because they didn't steal any elections. You are part of the jaded section of our society that believes everything you read.
2007-12-20 05:09:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
If they had the power to rig the elections in 2000 and 2004 then what happened in 2006? It's amazing how people are lacking common sense these days.
2007-12-20 13:10:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Abu#2 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
It seem like the vote count controllers mainly act on presidential elections.
2007-12-20 13:17:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Waas up 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because every recount of 2000 (even the ones that didn't count) showed Bush winning, and 2004 wasn't even close.
2007-12-20 13:12:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ricky T 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Ah, so winning is now synonymous with stealing. So ho do you think will steal the Super Bowl this year? Who's gonna steal the Stanley Cup?
2007-12-20 13:11:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by DOOM 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Because the elections were fair.
2007-12-20 13:13:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
We found the formula to combat it:
Come out and vote in such huge numbers that cheating cannot be reasonably achieved.
It's harder to swing 10 Million votes than 30,000.
2007-12-20 13:10:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Schmorgen 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
Your PROOF you liberal yingyang.
2007-12-20 13:16:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋