sounds reasonable to me!
2007-12-20 04:11:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am quoting this from an earlyer post...
Black holes do not eat up everything. People always hear that even light cannot escape from a black hole without really understanding what that means. People just think that gravity must be really strong and so it would reach out an pull stuff in. But it can't because gravity gets weaker with distance. Planets have gravity too; weaker gravity, but still gravity. And that gravity traps things on the planets just as surely as a black hole's gravity does. A meteor falling to Earth can never escape again. But Earth is not sucking up all the meteors and asteroids in space. Only now and then one accidentally hits Earth. It is the same with a black hole. If something accidentally hits it, it is trapped there, but it can pass by the black hole and keep going just like it can pass by Earth. Its path will be curved by the black hole's gravity, but unless the meteor actually hits the black hole, its curving orbital path will just take the meteor back away again, kind of like a comet coming really close to the Sun and curving around it and escaping back to deep space again.
..... this is true. However as the mass of the singularity grows so does the horizion and escape velocities of objects that may or may not come near. Then as the sigularities, threw time and movement get away from the mass that surounds them,(either threw absorbtion or repulshion) they become more mobile and more likely to engulf objects into their horizions. Those objects that achieve orbits around the singularity become streched to the point where there masses are lined up atom to atom, glueon to gleuon, etc, etc making them more likely to be added to the mass of the singularity because of how small they are. Than when you add time to the equation available mass decreases and the speed of the singularities increase and .... well than probabability wins out.
I would say yes.
2007-12-20 04:52:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Andrew 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Black holes do not eat up everything. People always hear that even light cannot escape from a black hole without really understanding what that means. People just think that gravity must be really strong and so it would reach out an pull stuff in. But it can't because gravity gets weaker with distance. Planets have gravity too; weaker gravity, but still gravity. And that gravity traps things on the planets just as surely as a black hole's gravity does. A meteor falling to Earth can never escape again. But Earth is not sucking up all the meteors and asteroids in space. Only now and then one accidentally hits Earth. It is the same with a black hole. If something accidentally hits it, it is trapped there, but it can pass by the black hole and keep going just like it can pass by Earth. Its path will be curved by the black hole's gravity, but unless the meteor actually hits the black hole, its curving orbital path will just take the meteor back away again, kind of like a comet coming really close to the Sun and curving around it and escaping back to deep space again.
2007-12-20 04:16:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
With due respect to STEPHEN HAWKING, I cannot convince myself that a black hole could exist. It is an extreme imagination based on available laws of physics but severely sized up. It has the same problem of figuring out the biggest human body possible without considering the limits for a human cell of feet to sustain its weight.
similarly, there must be also a limit at which matter clusters to form a big mass. Im working on it.
2007-12-20 05:27:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by bongnate 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
It would be possible if the universe were to contract, but it appears that the observed rate of the expansion of the universe is higher than the escape velocity, thus the expansion will continue forever, with everything inside the universe getting farther apart, such that the large black holes will never interact.
2007-12-20 04:22:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tony 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
i think of you're extraordinarily perplexed. The LHC has no longer something to do with darkish count. darkish count is a hypothetical form of count concept as much as clarify a extensive distinction between the estimated mass of galaxies and the stated mass of an identical galaxies. as a results of fact the subject we are in a position to verify can basically account for an extremely small share of the mass that galaxies might desire to have (judging via their gravitational result on different issues) there might desire to be a extensive volume of count we won't be able to see quickly. those products, approximately which all of us understand next to no longer something, is declared as darkish count. the huge Hadron Collider isn't designed to create black holes of any length. It has no longer been not on time on the grounds that 2005; it replaced into basically in basic terms finished in September 2008. It has basically "failed" as quickly as.
2016-12-18 05:35:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well... it sounds like u are relating to a balloon that can eat. black holes pulls all matter within its gravitational field and the matter is theoretically crushed out of existence so it may not be exactly possible for black holes to "eat each other up" interesting concept though!
2007-12-20 04:18:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by cosmogirl2100 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
good question but how can we find out? NASA might have a theories about this
2007-12-20 04:18:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by . 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Doesn't it tic you off?
2007-12-20 05:00:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Thomas E 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
not in my lifetime...
2007-12-20 04:13:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋