Doesn't this demonstrate what's wrong with our health care system?

Question

Rudy Guiliani goes to the hospital for "flu like symptoms". Many Americans couldn't afford to go to the hospital if they contracted the plague.

fairly smart - I have alergies but I had to quit going for treatments fifteen years ago.

And if you have health care it doesn't mean you can afford to go to the doctor. (co-pays, deductables, out of pocket first dollars, etc)

Answer 1

I know I can't afford to go to the hospital, & I have athsma! I would have to do with a regular doc after symptoms appear, & manifest & affect my breathing...

Answer 2

Rudy Guiliani going to hospital is not a bad thing. Many americans not being able to afford going to hospital is.

I live in the UK and work in the NHS (our universal health care system). It has problems, but not as many as the US healthcare system has. Despite spending much more per head of population than other developed countries, the US has worse health outcomes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care#Economics Life expectancy and infant mortality figures in the US are higher than in other developed countries, despite more money being spent (and wasted) in the USA.

In the UK there are waiting lists for routine problems. Problems that can not wait are treated as emergencies. Also, in the UK, people can also have private health care.

I can understand Americans being proud of living in the richest and most powerful country in the world. What I can not understand is why Amercians settle for an expensive healthcare system where babies die that would have a better chance of life if born in another developed country.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2167865,00.html

Answer 3

Although an overhaul of the current system would be laborious and overly expensive to all in the long run, something must be done to allow greater access and keep costs to individuals in line. Two issues that need to be addressed are exhorbitant visitation charges and whether or not illegal immigrants should be included. The latter would effect healthcare expense the most. I believe a personal healthcare expense account tied in to ones retirement benefits would be easiest to implement. It would have to be for legal residents of the U.S. however, and the individual's account would reflect medical costs over the span of ones working years. In other words, if you don't use a certain amount on medical expenses, then you would have more money for retirement. Just an idea.

Answer 4

Just because someone can afford health insurance and others can't doesn't demonstrate what is wrong with our health care system. Take capitalism out of all of it except for Doctors and nurses. Nobody else should profit from the ill.

Answer 5

The problem with our health care system is many can't afford insurance and those that can have to figure out a new system each year with new providers and procedures and less benefits.

Its become too complicated and unaffordable.

Why is health insurance tied to employment anyway? Do people without full-time jobs not need doctors? Why does our employer get to decide who provides our care? The whole system is goofy.

Answer 6

No. What is wrong is illegals and the uninsured are mandated treatment they cannot pay for. The cost is passed on to everyone else. Get rid of the illegals and get rid of easy lawsuits and the costs of health care will level off.

Answer 7

study trials are frequently manipulated. in the event that they do no longer pop out the way they desire then they are in a position to debunk them. it relatively is an worry-free question purely attempt going to the chiropractor whilst your neck is out and notice how great it works. what form of drugs is going to place your neck decrease back in place whilst it quite is out of line? consistent with possibility they could spend their money time and attempt on issues which would be greater efficient.

Answer 8

And they shouldn't go to the hospital for the flu - they should see their doctor or go to a clinic. Even better - stay at home and don't spread the germs. There is no medical treatment for viruses.

Answer 9

It is sad but very true, most people can't afford health insurance and I'm sure the government pays for every cent of his

Answer 10

For those that emulate "Universal health Care"


The Costs of Free Care
Socialized Medicine: The Canadian Experience

The first thing to realize is that free public medicine isn't really free. What the consumer doesn't pay, the taxpayer does, and with a vengeance. Public health expenditures in Quebec amount to 29 per cent of the provincial government budget. One-fifth of the revenues come from a wage tax of 3.22 per cent charged to employers and the rest comes from general taxes at the provincial and federal levels. It costs $1,200 per year in taxes for each Quebec citizen to have access to the public health system. This means that the average two-child family pays close to $5,000 per year in public health insurance. This is much more expensive than the most comprehensive private health insurance plan. "