THATS BUILDING UP HOME BASE . JUST A ONE TIME THING . WHOEVER SQUNDERS THEIR MONEY ITS NOT UNCLE SAM FAULT THEY CAN SAY THEY DOING THEIR PART . MUST BE 18YRS ,SOCIAL PROOF , FINGER PRINT SCAN SO YOU CANT COME BACK FOR SECONDS. THAT'LL BE NICE HUH?
2007-12-20 03:53:03 · 11 answers · asked by AFRO-MAN 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
...that would be nice, but then again
it would mess up the economy (I think), but oh well...ahaha
I mean, it's not like it didn't happen once before in the US (economy screwed up)...perhaps things will go out differently this time (I hope)
but yea...
it would be nice because right now...
I'm in some serious money issue and I just turned 18 in Oct!!!
right in time to be jailed for some stupid scam in ebay :(
I don't have the money to pay :(
sigh...I guess bad luck is written all over me
hopefully I can fix the problem soon...
2007-12-22 07:04:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
consistent with possibility you by no potential heard of the foodstuff and Drug administration. or the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms. life like policies are actually mandatory as time and time back this is been shown self regulation does not artwork. seem on the oil spill contained in the gulf. government makes use of sin tax to enhance sales partly to conceal the cost of the sin. Cigarette tax to conceal smoking appropriate wellness fees, alcohol taxes to conceal the cost of alcohol appropriate regulation enforcement and wellness themes and so on. New to the checklist is rapid foodstuff tax. for the comparable motives. you are able to SMOKE AND DRINK and function A BURGER AND FRIES in case you opt to , IT purely fees something. If McDonald's grow to be so frightened approximately it they could decrease fees sufficient to conceal the tax. Chicago electorate choose the politicians who make the gun policies for Chicago. there is not any requirement that a citizen who desires to very own a gun stay contained in the city of Chicago. whilst and if the will of the electorate of Chicago be certain gun possession is something they decide to enable, they are in a position to and could vote it into being. purely as there is not any requirement that the state of Wyoming limit weapons to accommodate the electorate who do no longer desire one.
2016-11-04 03:21:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You'd soon be paying about $15 for a big mac and about $20 per gallon for gas. At the same time that the AMT would be gobbling up your $100K.
2007-12-20 03:59:58 · answer #3 · answered by nileslad 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
they already do it....enlist in the navy...you get a 20 thousand dollar sign up bonus and a million dollars in training. there ya go
2007-12-20 08:22:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. It would not be nice. crack heads would buy their crack, poverty would most likely increase, and if everybody has a 100,000 dollars merchandise, produce, etc. would most likely increase in price.
I think it would be a bad idea.
2007-12-20 03:59:22 · answer #5 · answered by View 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Good Idea. We should write the president.
2007-12-20 03:56:33 · answer #6 · answered by Mommy of 3 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nice indeed but who is going to pay for all that???
2007-12-20 03:56:18 · answer #7 · answered by Samm 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure, that way we can have a $100,000.00 tax increase for everyone as well.
2007-12-20 03:56:52 · answer #8 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Where will the money come from?
2007-12-20 06:15:34 · answer #9 · answered by wmicah33 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Can you imagine how many crack heads they would be supporting??????
2007-12-20 03:56:36 · answer #10 · answered by God Bless America 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋