If existence requires a creator, and God exists, who created God?

Answer 1

we did!

Answer 2

When I was very young, I asked when was G-d born? She said, "he always was, and always would be." At five this scared me alot.
The fact, I accept it, is that there was a singularity. Then, 13+ billion Earth years ago, the Big Bang started the Universe. Time, just a measure of the expansion, does not require a before, since there was no before. The existence of a supreme being which does not require time, in and of itself, leaves it to the unknowable. Did the Supreme exist in a different Universe? Unknowable. Did the Supreme come into existence at the moment of the Big Bang? Unknowable.
You have to limit yourself to what can be known.

Answer 3

Actually the first religions we know of were polytheistic. Hinduism even outdates Judaism by a good margin, and Zoroastrianism, the oldest monotheistic religion, outdates Judaism. Perhaps you should be talking of the Gods :O Myself, I know complexity must come from simplicity. We do not understand the processes of how our universe came to be about yet, the most likely option is the multi-verse, multiple universes and big bangs happening with regularity.

Answer 4

Obviously, "God's creator" would be all the answer you need, but that's because your conundrum is badly written.

Actually, I think most people would simply challenge that first premise. True, that undermines any attempt to prove God's existence, but I'm happy to see circular proofs undermined in any case.

Answer 5

You have it backwards. The word 'existence' presupposes 'creator' and not vice versa. The created can only come into being via the Uncreated. Obviously. -- Else you have an infinite regress.

Answer 6

The religious will tell you he created himself out of nothing, but that's like smoke without a fire. On the other hand it's a little like the big bang.
Two of the reasons I choose the big bang is because it has a natty bit of reasoning behind it and no-one ever got burned/tortured/excommunicated or threatened with eternal damnation for doubting it.

Answer 7

something like God, is asserted to be eternal. meaning that God (regardless of that could be) is outdoors of time. you are able to some have something with a beginning up that has a tendency to infinity even though it isn't the comparable as eternal. eternal has no beginning up or end, this is meaningless to communicate approximately such innovations given the definition. If the belief of eternity exists then for all in intensity purposes, that, to me, is God. no longer non secular, purely non secular and involved with theories of time.

Answer 8

Ah, another god conundrum. Don't expect intelligent answers, however.

My opinion - the only logical conclusion that one can draw is that creation does not require a creator.

Answer 9

Any human with common sense can under stand that he/she has little control over his physical boy itself. As said it in the BIBLE, a human is not capable of achieving even trivial things like making, one of his hair white or black at his will.

God is a concept, if you want to visualize, an entity who can do things by a mere wish. It is similar to abstract entities in mathematics like imaginary numbers which is used to express and explain many physical phenomenea.

As human inlellect is limited as is varied from one individual to another, concept of god is yet to be expressed in full formality understandable to average human being.

So in order to reconcile with ones own existance majority of humans needs a creater as temporary solution to all unexplainable. Any way god exist or get created in the mind of individuals, and one of his rol is the creater of all existance for that particular individual.

Answer 10

If he was the creator he could have created himself

Answer 11

and the follow-up question, who created the god that created god that created god?