Elijah Muhammad Once Told My Father That Some Billions of years ago Black People On Earth Sent Some humans to?

Question

mars. Before You Say its absurb i have found proof.
It has been said that there are megalithic ruins and remains on the surface of Mars. The Zulus of South Africa as well as many other African tribes have legends that speak of their origins being from Mars. Could it be that it was OUR Black African ancestors who were responsible for that civilization that once thrived on the now debunked red planet? Evidence points in that direction. It has been discussed within various circles of Astrophysicists that Mars was once a moon of another planet now destroyed. The asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter is widely believed to be the remains of Mars’ parent planet. Referred to as Planet X. Tom Van Flandern has a very convincing “exploded planet hypothesis” that cannot be easily refuted by many scientists of today. If this and many of the other points I have brought forward in this essay are disseminated widely, that could force history as we know it to be rewritten. What do you think

Answer 1

You know, I was going to leave this question alone, lest I be labeled a 'me too' kind of guy...
This has to be one of the deepest, smelliest, most absurd piles of bovine excrement I've stumbled across in a long, long time.
You, Sir, have issues.
I would admonish you to re- start your medications, and leave these nice people alone.
I wish for you the very best of luck.

Answer 2

What i think is that somebody might need to up their dosage. First of all, there were no humans billions of years ago. Beyond four billion years ago, there wasn't even any life. Second, Mars has been debunked? I have to wonder what that was I saw last night then. Third, it is NOT widely believed that the asteroid belt is the remains of an exploded planet. There is not enough material in the asteroid belt to make up a decent sized moon, let alone a whole planet. Fourth, I think that if you looked into REAL Black African history, or Black American history, you would find plenty to be very proud of, and wouldn't have to deny reality and concoct stories about moon bases and Mars colonies founded by your ancestors to shore up your sense of self worth.

Answer 3

I think that you are completely insane. But that may just be my opinion. How about the rest of you guys?

It is far too easy to pick holes in your ignorance. It would be like shooting fish in a barrel. Ahh what the heck!

1. One billion years ago there were no black people. There were no people at all. In fact there wasn´t even life on land and the life in the oceans consisted of primitive singlecelled organisms and a few multicellular. Oh and the african continent didn´t exist either...

2. If you clumped together every asteroid in the asteroid belt you would get a body not even the size of our moon. Hardly a parent planet of Mars then. NOBODY refutes this.

3. And there are no artifacts of ruins of any kind on Mars.

4.

5.

6.

I could go on forever but someone mentioned pearls before swine so I´ll stop here...

Answer 4

I think that almost every statement in this essay is demonstrably wrong.

Neither black people, nor any other people, lived on Earth billions of years ago. The earliest single-cell organisms only appeared 3.8 billion years ago, and modern humans have only been around for about a quarter of a million years.

There haven't been any megalithic ruins found on Mars. Every formation found on that planet can be demonstrated to be the result of natural processes.

The Zulus, according to my research, do not believe that people came from Mars. Their creation myth says that Unkulunkulu, the Zulu creator, came from the reeds and that he created all people. None of the sources I've consulted mention Mars or any other planet.

>"the now debunked red planet"?

Look up the word "debunked". Mars hasn't been debunked. We're still pretty sure it's really there. The only aspect of Mars that has been thoroughly debunked is the idea that there are alien artifacts littering the surface.

>"Evidence points in that direction."

No it doesn't. None of it does.

I have never heard anybody propose that Mars was once a moon of a now-destroyed planet, nor that the asteroid belt represents Mars's parent planet. I HAVE heard that the asteroid belt represents the remains of a planet that failed to coalesce, perhaps because of disruption by Jupiter's gravity, but that's it. I think you have used the term "widely believed" too liberally here. Do you have any sources to back up this assertion?

Planet X does not now, nor did it ever refer to any sort of failed or destroyed planet between the orbits of Jupiter and Mars. Instead, it was a designation used to describe a large hypothetical planet orbiting beyond Neptune. The only reason anybody ever suggested its existence was because there seemed to be gravitational perturbations in the orbit of Neptune that couldn't be explained unless there were another large planet out there. Later, the calculations were shown to be in error; the supposed gravitational perturbations disappeared and the myth of Planet X was laid to rest. So not only is this statement based upon a flawed idea (that Planet X ever existed), but it puts Planet X in the wrong location entirely.

>"Tom Van Flandern has a very convincing “exploded planet hypothesis” that cannot be easily refuted by many scientists of today."

Forgive me for being skeptical, but Van Flandern is a crackpot. Mainstream scientists aren't actively trying to refute his ideas because those ideas are so out of synch with accepted ideas. And before you go all "conspiracy theory" on me, let me remind you that mainstream scientific ideas get that way because they're well-tested and supported by tons upon tons of evidence. Scientists aren't just dogmatic zealots who toss out alternative ideas out of hand, but they're not going to pay heed to extraordinary claims unless the claimant has extraordinary evidence. Van Flandern has none. And not to be insulting, but Van Flandern's "exploding planet hypothesis" would only seem convincing to those who are uneducated about real astronomy.

I think that these points will never force history to be rewritten, because they're all wrong. Disseminating this information would be nothing but harmful, because it would cause a lot of people to pay heed to information that is not in anyway supported by real science. There's already too much of that going on. I hope that this question was intended as a joke, and if it was not, please do yourself a favor and read up on some real science. Scientists aren't just trying to trick you, okay? They do what they do for a reason...so that we can ALL be better informed about the world around us. Good luck.

EDIT: Richard...oh, I know. But I figure that if the asker takes away even one little bit of truth, it'll be worth it.

Answer 5

There were no black people billions of years ago. There were no white people either. Humans have only been around for a million years or so, and the Zulu for a thousand years or so. If you're going to have any credibility, get your basic facts straight!

Answer 6

Nice response Lucas. Of course you are responding to the delusions of the mentally challenged and you are "casting pearls before swine". If this is in fact a real "question" NOTHING you could possibly write would convince him that his absurd world view is not just wrong but really, really silly.

Answer 7

The honorable Mr. Muhammad may have been an expert on religion, but his space science was evidently.. a little mixed up.

Answer 8

Ah, further racist excrement from battle4life's rabidly insane imagination.

Why are you so negative, dude? And why don't you spend some time actually doing some intelligent research about this horsemanure you keep spouting.

Answer 9

humans have been around only for millions of years, not billions.

elijah is pulling your father's leg.

Answer 10

The White Man Is Lieing Black People Have no birth records infact your carbon dating method is false my people go back trillions of years ago