he stated that if it was him that was being accused,he would not be having statements come through his agent ...he would be battling,denying,these false statements his self...loud and clear.and would have already filed a lawsuit.if you have not come out fightingby now...with your reputation on the line,that says alot about your innocence...or lack there of.
this is one met fan who just became a john smotlz fan.like he said.if he was being accused...he would take a lie detector test right now to prove he was telling the the truth.lets see roger do that.
2007-12-20 01:21:57 · 13 answers · asked by mojo569 4 in Sports ➔ Baseball
john smoltz...let me make sure i spell his name right from now on
2007-12-20 01:34:12 · update #1
Smoltz saying it is much different than Shilling.
Smoltz has an actual point, I would sue also if I was as innocent as Roger claims he is. (I don't believe him!)
Schilling is just a big mouth wanna-be know it all.
He thinks he's so much smarter than everyone else.
Also, Smoltz never said anything about giving awards back were as Schilling has.
2007-12-20 01:29:31 · answer #1 · answered by Starks 3 · 1⤊ 6⤋
You can't judge Clemens on the line Schilling or Smoltz draw in the sand....show me something more than what ONE man says to prove Roger wrong ...until then...I take no stock in either side.
2007-12-20 12:16:07 · answer #2 · answered by earlofsnoh 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If that was my stellar career on the line, I would first and foremost take a lie detector test, sue the crap outta everyone connected with the mitchell report and demand an apology, I would look forward to testifying in front of congress and i would demand a written apology. But then again, I have NEVER taken drugs.
2007-12-20 12:11:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I happen to like Schilling - he talks too much, but at least he isn't afraid to say what he thinks unlike 99.9% of pro athletes.
besides, how can Clemens prove he didn't take drugs- it's just his word.
I agree with Smoltz 100%; no one is coming out and denying these allegations - if they were untrue, they would be.
2007-12-20 11:39:42 · answer #4 · answered by mikep426 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shilling is a self aggrandizing JERKOFF. He only talks to hear his own voice(or read his own blog, as the case may be). I think most players in MLB and fans outside of Boston stopped listening to him long ago. His career arc is similiar to that of Clemens, Bonds & many others. He just isn't as good, and is bitter about it...Always was. I wonder that if Senator Mitchell was not a part owner & board member of the Red Sox, would some of the names & pages dedicated them be a little different.
2007-12-20 10:55:48 · answer #5 · answered by kris d 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i've always liked the guy!
go smoltz!!!
2007-12-20 13:39:34 · answer #6 · answered by ♥ mimi ♥ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right on! Roger is a dodger...and not the L.A. kind
2007-12-20 13:04:31 · answer #7 · answered by Lefty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please get your facts straight before spouting off "facts".
Mitchell is not an owner of the Red Sox. He is an unpaid consultant and is named a director.
2007-12-20 11:02:40 · answer #8 · answered by jlz 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
couldnt agree more,smoltz i luv ya
2007-12-20 09:27:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Right on and these guys are telling it like it is.
2007-12-20 10:46:20 · answer #10 · answered by Michael M 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋