No. Also the people at "Run, Cynthia, Run" should seek help.
2007-12-19 23:44:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
She knows she has little chance. She is the typical loud mouthed activist with her biased agenda. I am from Atlanta and I cringe every time I am traveling on 285 and see Cynthia McKinney Parkway as I don't see what she has ever done beneficial to the state that warrants that to begin with. She craves the public spotlight is the main reason she is running and believe it or not, she has some backers who obviously have little or no common sense to back such a public idiot. Soon everybody, if they don't already know, will see what a true lunatic she is.
2007-12-20 08:41:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by toughguy2 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
How is she any more insane than Ross "Suckin' Sound" Perot sounded when he ran for the Republican nomination way back in the day?
He used graphs, frank talk, impatient demeanor (the man is no teacher), he picked as his running a former POW and War Hero, James Stockdale, who came off as senile (and was VICIOUSLY Made fun of) but who actually had trouble hearing because his war captors had punctured his eardrums during torture, and Perot even claimed to have dropped out of the race because of (later proved nonexistent) death threats against his family members. Despite the graphs, despite the frank talk, people thought he was nuts.
I saw nothing in her acceptance speech anymore "insane" than I have seen over and over in here, invariably touting Ron Paul as the only candidate "not owned by the corporations"; McKinney's said the same thing. Big difference is, McKinney's campaign is grassroots- THEY came to HER.
That impresses me mightily. Maybe we finally WILL have a candidate who isn't owned by Big Oil or the Drug and Insurance Industries...
What are a snowball's chances, if Hell freezes over?
2007-12-20 08:08:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Dude, don't insult the tenacity of a snowball, cause I think it would have a better shot at surviving the fire and wind up in the White House before Ms. McKinney.
But to answer your first question, definite possability.
2007-12-20 07:20:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
The wild-eyes behind the logically unripe outpourings put you off.?
2007-12-20 07:32:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Doctor DNC 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
No you aren't.
The thing that really makes her actually insane is that she thinks she can win!
She is definitely "touched".
2007-12-20 07:33:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by MrOrph 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Nader would have been the better choice for the green party, that's all I have to say.
2007-12-20 07:20:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by somber 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
I don't know about insane, but she definitely is suffering from RDD (Reality Deficit Disorder). To her defense, RDD is common among Liberals who lose elections.
2007-12-20 07:33:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
She's a prime example of what liberalism will do to the human mind.
2007-12-20 08:35:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by granddad1070@sbcglobal.net 6
·
0⤊
5⤋
If you actually think that, I think that you are clinically insane.
2007-12-20 07:36:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Darth Vader 6
·
2⤊
3⤋