Bush is the devil. The smell of his sulfur from Washington reaches all the way down here to Arizona.
Bush is a low life piece of ****, he deserves all the justice that was metered out to Saddam and then some.
The people thumbing me down are jealous because I am able to tell you the truth and they can't ,because they have been taught lies from birth.
2007-12-19 22:43:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by somber 3
·
6⤊
19⤋
Oh my particular! His errors have been given the neocons kicked out of congress and he has single handedly decreased the inhabitants of iraq by a great style of folk getting killed there as a effect of his incompetence. He has additionally torn up the form in the call of national risk-free practices, and proved as quickly as in for all that the only individual he listens to is Cheney.
2016-11-23 17:02:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The dems and media are desperately trying to hide anything good about his presidency. If you are told over and over "he is bad", despite the facts there will be the tendancy to believe that. Those who don't care to check facts and those of lower IQ will take up the rant. This is what they are counting on.
He has done many good things during his term, but with the vile the media and dems spew it is hard to see reality.
2007-12-20 04:31:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bleh! 6
·
3⤊
4⤋
Plenty.
Unfortunately the propaganda spread by those who call themselves "liberal" tends to create doubt in the minds of those who are not proficient at research.
In fact the current "liberal" propaganda is eerily similar to that used by the National Socialist Workers Party of Germany.
Here is a perfect example that is reasonably easy to research.
If you check out GPPACCESS.GOV you can review the budgets for both Clinton and Bush. You will find that presidents plan budgets 4 years into the future and not the immediate budget pending. This is because budgets have to go through a lot of congressional negotiations. Addendum spending bills can be tacked on to budgets, but, compared to the entire budget these are minor changes.
Clinton wrote the US budgets from 1997 to 2004 going from a 4% deficit to a 23% deficit. President Bush has taken that 23% deficit down to 9% in a couple of years. The deficit was primarily caused by the Clinton recession of 2000 which resulted in multiple years of sub 4% GDP. (BEA.GOV) President Bush managed to institute tax cuts which stimulated the economy and increased the GDP to above 6%. This increase in GDP resulted in an increase in tax receipts which reduced the 23% deficit to 9%.
You won't find that on any liberal website because liberals think people are stupid enough to believe that the US government lives hand to mouth instead of planning budgets years ahead of time.
If you review the amount of spending on domestic human resources (welfare, SSI, etc-what people call social programs) you will find Bush has spent 70% of the budget on social programs and Clinton only spent 50%.
Further you will also find that Clinton funneled a much higher percentage of money into the military industrial complex in the form of funding for research which required no deliverables. As a result troops did not have armor when they went into Iraq.
Again, easily researched and you won't find Hillary Clinton, Barak Obama or anyone in the media explaining any of this to voters.
H Ross Perot tried and was lambasted by the media.
In a nation where monkeys can do math better than illiterate college graduates I can understand why propaganda works so well.
2007-12-19 23:27:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
8⤋
Hey wassup.Havnt really answered much questions lately.
About urquestion, only ifi was jewish or oil guy,there is NOTHING good he did.
cya around
2007-12-20 10:14:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by BUSH/ISRAEL =warcriminal 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
He has taught us not to trust authoritarian republicans.
He has alerted America to what fascism looks like.
2007-12-19 23:57:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
Yes, and when history shows this there are going to be a lot of upset libs and dems.
2007-12-19 23:07:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Erinyes 6
·
6⤊
6⤋
He didn't have any more children (actually credit for that probably goes to his wife.)
2007-12-20 04:02:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by golfer7 5
·
5⤊
4⤋
Depends on how you look at it. If you are one of the owners of blackwater you would say he is great. If you are Haliburton, bush is great. Oil companies same way. In fact all of corporate America thinks he is great. Look at all the money they are making on this war. The American people, different story. He has put the country in huge debt & congress just gave him 70 billion more to keep the war going & corporate America's profits rolling in. The american people, different story. Many youg Americans dead. Many thousands terribly wounded & disfigured. I guess it's all in how you look at it. Oh, One more thing, he is rebuilding Iraq while america's infra structure goes to hell. What a guy!
2007-12-19 22:52:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by peepers98 4
·
7⤊
10⤋
Plenty. Tax cuts, stimulating a deflated economey from the internet business bust, dropped unemployment levels lower than Clinton saw, oversaw the many record breaking days on the DJIA, liberated two countries from ruthless regtimes, and set up a system that has thwarted numerous terrorist attacks since 9/11. And that's just a few things off the top of my head.
2007-12-19 22:46:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
13⤊
11⤋
I think you would have to look long and hard, or maybe redefine the word good. I am sure there have been somethings, but it seems that even when he tries to do good it isn't perceived as good. The best thing I heard of him doing is signing a bill that will allow the survivors of the VA Tech shooting get the donation monies tax free. But I am sure that there must be other things more important to the world then that, but I am not sure what if anything.
2007-12-19 22:46:35
·
answer #11
·
answered by redhotboxsoxfan 6
·
3⤊
13⤋