The list of Nobel Peace Prize recipients?
Or the list of former Times people of the year and why?
2007-12-19 20:57:42 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well I don't know if you're old enough to remember but in the 60's and 70's there was a kid's show called 'Romper Room', where Miss Elizabeth would gaze into a non-existent mirror and say "I see Jimmy, and Tommy, and Susie and Mary. . . . . . etc. etc"
All the kids watching wanted her to say their names . So that's my 'big' dream. . . to hear her say "I see Earnest' !!! Smile .
2007-12-20 02:57:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Nobel Peace Prize. the times people of the year is just a way to sell more mags.
2007-12-19 21:09:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Time
Because not of all [some? sure] of the Time Persons of the Year have been complete and utter disgaces like the Peace Prize recipiants
2007-12-19 22:36:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wow, great question. I'd have to say Nobel, because Hitler is on the list of former Times people of the year. Besides, I'm already on the Times list...a couple of years ago, The American Soldier.
2007-12-19 21:01:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Nobel. The international prize includes $1.5 million and it is given for contributing to world peace. Time Magazine awards no money, and the "Person of the Year" is just the magazine's end of the year promotional gimmick.
2007-12-19 21:03:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
As a citizen of Florida in 2000 I was ranked, with the rest of the state, as one of People's 40 most interesting people. And that was enough, I don't want any kind of pressure or microscope put on me due to increased notoriaty. Many Floridians felt the same we, the mojority we're never hand picked to represent Florida on the nightly news or anything, but to wake up and go to bed hearing about your state and it's citizens stressed us out beyond belief and actually depressed me for a while.
2007-12-19 21:09:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither! I would rather choose something that is really a special honor.
Maybe one where charitable donations are made where one would truly make a difference in the life, or lives of people that really needed it. Whether it be clothing, food or monetary donations to help those with or in a devastating condition.
However, I would prefer that list was not made public. It is only special in my own heart.
.
.
2007-12-19 23:21:49 · answer #7 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the priority with removing him is that his alternative might ought to be voted on by the very scumbags who led to the project in the 1st place. much greater suitable permit him stay in place of work 'til the subsequent election while with a bit of luck we are going to have a cleanser abode of Commons which would be in a greater suitable place to decide on a Speaker who might uphold the main properly known traditions of democracy quite than attempting to suppress them. All we want is for Gordon Brown to do the respectable element and phone an election on the earliest threat so we are able to get this mess in the back of us and handle the actual issues that face this u . s . a ..
2016-11-23 16:59:41 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the Nobel Committee ever nominated me for anything, I'd send it back to them with a "no thanks". I don't want to be counted in the same ranks with Yasser Arafat.
If Time Mag nominated me for "person of the year", I'd be ranked with Hitler.
Somehow, I don't consider either of these flattering. Granted, Hitler was a long time ago, but I don't think the judgment at Time has improved since then.
2007-12-19 21:01:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I wouldn't mind having my name on either of those two lists for
honest reasons. But when the roll is called up yonder, I definitely want to be on that list.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-12-19 22:02:24 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋