English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Shouldn't we be listening to the politicians instead? (note my sarcasm).
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071212103004.htm
Or does drilling oil heat the mantle and we're still all going to die?

2007-12-19 17:04:31 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Think 1st "another reason" can also mean "a different reason". Nevertheless I see your point, I just don't follow the man-made hypothesis unquestioningly.

2007-12-19 18:08:56 · update #1

6 answers

No they did not say it wasn't global warming.
"Scientists have discovered what they think may be another reason why Greenland 's ice is melting"
You notice the word "another" in the first sentence?

“However, to effectively separate and quantify human impacts on climate change, we must understand the natural impacts, too."
Notice they say "human impacts" here?

And no we should not be listening to the politicians instead, radio or TV entertainers either. We should read and comprehend scientific studies like this one from Science Daily.

EDIT. It is good that you question things and do not follow blindly, far too many take others words as fact already.
I do not claim that Man is the only or even the major cause of climate change, never heard anyone claim this. As humans, the things that we can do to affect the climate change are very limited. We cannot stop volcanic activity, nor cool the sun. We can conserve, cut energy usage, and find other sources of renewable energy.
This has also been a National Security mandate since Nixon, every President since has pointed out the need to supply ourselves with energy.

As the only species on Earth capable of rational thought and choosing our own actions, it makes sense that we should be the best stewards of our planet. If it turns out down the road that mans impact on climate change is negligible, the actions recommended by many scientists would still have slowed pollution at least.
That would not be a bad thing.

2007-12-19 17:29:45 · answer #1 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 1 2

All evidence that contradicts the will of The Goracle is to be ignored. All contradictory evidence will be outlawed under a Hillary Clinton presidency,and any scientists foolish enough to question the new religion of "Global Warming" will be jailed for "their own good"

AD

2007-12-19 18:50:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Al Gore doesn't know what he's talking about????? Holy Cow. For the guy who invented the internet and possibly the carbon credit farce, I am shocked. Helps when you have real scientists with real science. Make a movie about this Al. What are going to say about this AL? What is your malfunction private?
I got it, we should put more smoke and crap in the air and block the suns rays to protect us from global warming and if the magma, we will use it to warm us instead.

2007-12-19 17:11:28 · answer #3 · answered by The Angry Elephant 4 · 5 2

hey no! you can't say that!! its the humans!!! THOSE EVIL HUMANS THAT ARE GLOBAL WARMING!!! those scientists are wrong. you must hate the Earth, don't u?

(note my sarcasm)

uk the sad thing is they will never be heard again. not in the media anyway. thats a really good website.

2007-12-19 17:11:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

I AGREE WITH YOU. ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS STOP AND LOOK AT HOW OFTEN AND MANY CHANGES THE PLANET HAS GONE THUR SINCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME. TO THINK THAT THESE CHANGES WILL NOT CONTINUE IS CRAZY.

2007-12-20 14:21:39 · answer #5 · answered by jerry z 6 · 0 0

Thanks, you just proved how little damage pollution does to the environment. Now we can continue to pollute without worry. (note my sarcasm)

2007-12-19 17:28:11 · answer #6 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers