BUSH, BUSH, CLINTON, CLINTON, BUSH, BUSH ________ Are Americans really stupid enough to vote for Clinton?

Question

BUSH_BUSH ///// CLINTON_CLINTON ///// BUSH_BUSH //// ????????

Can you really say you are happy with how our country has been run in recent history? If you are someone looking for a change for America, Hilary Clinton is NOT change.

Answer 1

If it'll give you any assurance. I for one am "stupid" enough. And if she gets in I guess you should leave the country because of all the "stupid" people here who agree with me.

Answer 2

If you are a republican, you can't vote in a Democrat primary. Why don't you wait until you see who is put up by both parties. If the democrats don't allow Clinton to win the nomination, then you won't have a chance to have another bush or clinton as president. You are voting for Obama without any knowledge of the other candidates.

Answer 3

It always shocks me when I hear people say that Hillary is a candidate for change. She is the textbook definition of politics as usual. She's using many of the same tactics that Bush Jr. used to get into office, and I can't blame her. They work incredibly well on the brainwashed and the uninformed. Fortunately she seems to be slipping in the polls. I just hope it's not too late.

Personally I think that there should be a written test about the candidates and the issues that you have to pass before you are allowed to vote. That would mean that only those who really care and really know what's going on would be able to decide the direction that the country goes in.

Answer 4

You mean Constitution requires amendment to the effect' one family one president'? If not, no person should run for more than 5 years in his life time. While Constitution does not rule out possibilities of multiple family members getting elected as presidents, these desperations have to remain .

Incidentally Britain remains a monarchical form of government, though the Queen/ king is just a constitutional head.

Another, after 8 years of Bush rule you don't feel Clinton days are continued. It is altogether different situation - nationally and internationally.

Answer 5

Sadly, there are a lot of Americans who believe their country should take care of them from cradle to grave and could care less about Foreign Policy or the National Debt.

They'll vote for Clinton.

Answer 6

I'm British and not living in the (not so United) States I'm relieved to say.. As an outsider I follow the Politics of the US on CNN, who I consider to be truthful. The Bush regime are warmongers and GW is an obvious cretin, as I've seen and heard him; and clearly shown in his body language to anyone who can read it. ANY CLINTON, ANY TIME! In preference to ANY Bush! NOTE:- The Government of England is NOT controlled by the Queen and will not be controlled by any future Monarch. (We might even decide to abolish Monarchy)

Answer 7

Change to me means getting the present party out of the White House. George Bush has done more damage to our country, our image around the world, our economy, our democracy, etc., that it would be hard to top him.

Answer 8

Bush Sr. was not re-elected for a second term.

Also, I think Clinton did a great job during both terms. Sure he made a few miscalculations, but overall, he was a strong diplomat who did a fine job as president!

Answer 9

Well, they were stupid enough to elect another Bush and I would bet good money that Jeb Bush will run in 2012. This is their way of being a dictatorship. Why is Bill and George H W such good buddies? Skull and Bones baby.

Answer 10

Honestly, completing the pattern is pretty much the only reason I can think of to vote for Hillary Clinton. And even I will admit, it is a pretty superficial one.

Answer 11

You have an extra "Bush" at the beginning, unless you are counting the time spent as Reagan's Vice President... in which case you should have another "Bush" at the beginning.