Is it true that it feels better for a woman to have intercourse with an uncircumcised male rather than cut men

Answer 1

I dont know about that but it is definitely more sanitary with a circumcised male. Bacteria can build up under the foreskin in uncircumcised males.

Answer 2

Somebody has already posted the Sex As Nature Intended It link - here's another study showing that uncircumcised tends to give more pleasure to the woman:
http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html

However I think in sex there are many other factors to do with technique and emotions of both parties etc. especially if a condom is involved. The theory does make sense though if you look at the links.

There is nothing unsanitary about being uncircumcised - bacteria only builds up under the foreskin if you have really, really bad hygiene. Most guys wash under their foreskin every day automatically. And guess what, a circumcised guy with bad hygiene can still carry germs. There is all sorts of bacteria around the vaginal area. How can chopping off skin be a replacement for washing?

OK - I did provide an actual study and the other one had loads of info too. They are definitely not saying all sex with circumcised men is bad, especially not if you love said man. What they are saying is that if a couple is having sexual problems, and some do, circumcision should be considered as a cause of these problems. For example if they have a problem with dryness, the woman might think it's her fault, when in fact it's to do with the guy's penis scraping out the moisture.

Those with husbands circumcised at birth will never know what sex would be like with the same man if he were intact, so can't say if it could get better or not.

Circumcised men don't last longer - a study showed maybe 10 seconds, they just thrust differently to get off.

Seems to me like people here are getting defensive because they don't want to admit that they might be missing anything. Nobody is saying that circumcised sex is crap but there is a lot of evidence pointing towards more pleasure for both partners when they have all of their genitals. It's logical.

Answer 3

Im a woman, and that i've got had intercourse with a circumcised guy, and a uncircumcised guy.. i could no longer sense a distinction mutually because it became interior me, I basically had to confirm to tug the exterior down. the two way intercourse is going to be good for the two companions if the sentiments are there, and you're keen to test

Answer 4

It probably doesnt make a big difference to the woman, but I'm sure its better for an uncircumsized man because his helmet is more sensitive to pleasure. Circumsized penises are permanently exposed hence degrade in sensitivity.

Answer 5

that's what they say yeah

http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com

btw - bacteria does not built up under the foreskin if the guy washes it. sure it's moist and warm but isn't a vagina? genitals are meant to be like that.

Answer 6

cut men can go on for a long time because their head is senseless because of repeated rubbing on the under wear. Cut ones are cleaner too.

Answer 7

No. The vagina only has maybe about 2 or so inches of actual senstation in her vagina. Anything further than that, and we can't feel a thing.

It's not really.....about how it looks, or if it's cut or uncut - it's about how you work it. (It is best if he's cut though - cleanliness.)

Answer 8

had sex with both and it's all about how the man works what he has.

Answer 9

nope.

Answer 10

No.