background behind them. Bart Simpson could be are next president, He is supported by Fox News and he no moral scruples.
2007-12-19 12:12:31 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Trying real hard to stay out of the political arena here, but ... not succeeding (duh). It's not a phenomenon unusual to the US government alone. It's a world-wide epidemic. Money can buy power, votes and control. Just can't buy sanity.
2007-12-19 12:41:40 · answer #1 · answered by OP 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In 2000, President Bust gained through 51%, and it substitute into through 233 votes (i'm ninety 5% constructive that's the final extensive type) in Flordia. the yank human beings needed him as president. In 2004, human beings nevertheless had wish interior the Iraq conflict, yet now we see we could have been extra desirable off with John Kerry. Oh, and we've not seen a drop of that oil in Iraq yet.
2016-12-11 09:39:53 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush -- Yes
Bart has principles, but lacks money & connections. Fox makes a lot of money keeping Bart where he is.
2007-12-19 12:19:02 · answer #3 · answered by Citizen1984 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush ain't the only proof y'all have had so far. Or any other government anywhere else. Give the guy a break. He is kind o' cute in an Alfred E. Newman sort of way. (MAD Magazine -- oooh, did I make an allusion?)
2007-12-19 12:54:14 · answer #4 · answered by Gone fishin' 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Money and family can't win you an election. You need uneducated, ignorant voters as well to elect someone that bad.
As for Bush himself, what family and money did for him is allow a very mediocre individual into jobs that he had no business being in---way over his head.
2007-12-19 12:38:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
absoloutly the only good that can come of his presidentsy iis that it will make the american people be more aware and hopefully more involved in the election process alos hopefully potintial president canidates will focus on what they will accomplish to fix the country and not on ripping appart the other canidates
2007-12-19 12:22:43 · answer #6 · answered by Gustove 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
absolutely.....and a lot of the reason is people who vote are more interested in, looks, and stories published in questionable papers and any number of things instead of finding out what the person stands for and if they are the person who will stand for what they believe in.....
2007-12-19 12:26:42 · answer #7 · answered by vi 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush won that election fair and square. He had more votes. He won 5-4. This is America, get used to it.
2007-12-19 12:33:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
If this were true, then Ted Kennedy and John Kerry would have been elected.
2007-12-19 12:25:10 · answer #9 · answered by TedEx 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no bush is proof positive that anyone can become president who knows how to ignore liberal whine and correctly administer poltical strategy and policy in the united states.
2007-12-19 12:18:56 · answer #10 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋