Hillary is a Yale graduate, Valedictorian, highly intelligent....a contrast from Bush don't you think?
This is why Republicans dislike her and dont want her to get the nomination. Because she'll crush any Repub.
2007-12-19
10:35:47
·
32 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
mav.......do u think it's fair to assess your work performance by the way your husband acts?
2007-12-19
10:41:07 ·
update #1
lttle.........have u ever thought of the fact that maybe Hillary is compassionate and forgiving, thats why she didnt divorce her husband?
Some people will do anything and everything for family you know. I admire her for this.
2007-12-19
10:43:05 ·
update #2
She's smart, but that doesn't make her morally fit to be president. She's power hungry and would sell her soul for her party's nomination. As far as I'm concerned, though, she doesn't have a soul to sell. She lost it when she continued to put up with her husband's infidelities.
Obama in '08!
2007-12-19 11:14:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I am not a fan of Bush. However, your question shows your ignorance.
While Hillary went to Wellesley College for college, GW Bush went to Yale. At Yale, Bush did better than John Kerry.
Bush then went ot Harvard, where he got an MBA.
Taht is a heck of a lot better that going to Yale and leading riots for murderer;s, leading to the burning of the Yale Law Library.
2007-12-19 11:13:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ron L 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
You know I find it hilarious that the left thinks that Bush is so dumb when in fact he has beaten you at every turn on the budget, defense spending, the Patriot Act, his Supreme Court nominees and all the other things dems were not able to do. Also before he was president he ran several companies that became successful under him. And then he became the governor of Texas where even the democrats said he was fair.(They are much less partisan in Texas).
Now what has Hillary ever accomplished? Bill put her in charge of education in Ark where she was able to lead it into 49th place out of 50 states. Her health care bill was a disaster not even able to get 1 single democratic vote. And as Senator she has written exactly one bill in 7 years. And that was to name a post office. This makes her qualified? My dad had a name for people like her.........educated idiots.
2007-12-19 11:00:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Brandon A 5
·
6⤊
0⤋
NOt at all, she still has to get by Obama and dennis K. She party platform is not helpong, you would think she could step up like Edwards and do something different from the DNC. By the way many people have given HER credit for the Clinton years and tha she actually ran the White House instead of Bill. Bill was a Rhodes Scholar and Carter had a ton in his admin, which lends to the idea that she did. I'll say this she ain't no robot and does not act like a android like "the man". Take care.
2007-12-19 11:04:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by R J 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
The President is also a Yale graduate and received a masters
degree from Harvard. The only contrast is that Hillary has a quick temper and folds under pressure while GW maintains his cool at all times. Hillary is the devil in disguise and will turn us into a socialist state. She is more venomous than a rattle snake. She has no experience and no significant qualifications.
2007-12-19 10:47:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bill 6
·
9⤊
1⤋
You guys will eventually have to stop comparing Hillary to Bush and start comparing her to the people who are actually running against her for President. I actually hope Hillary does get the nomination, because she is eminently unlikable and has no demonstrable values. It will make it easier for a strong Republican candidate to bury her.
2007-12-19 11:22:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow!!. First off being book smart has nothing to do with being able to perform in a job. Another thing it that most Americans are just average people and see that it is easier to connect with Bush because he is not arrogant and stuck-up (which is the main reason why I don't like Hillary), not to mention they champion for the lower class people so that they can make a group dependent on them so that they can keep power. Most of the people from Ivy League institutions have no contention or care about the average citizens and are out for their own self indulgent causes.
I don't want Hillary in power because I have to actually work for a living and don't the Liberals to take what little I have and give it to those who do not want to get a job, have babies that they cannot support )so that they can get a welfare check, and create up surd laws that does not allow me to support my county ( i.e. not being able to recite the Pledge of Allegiance in schools) and taking away my Christmas Tree ( ITS NOT A HOLIDAY TREE). If that is not enough reason to not like Liberals, I have issues with blaming America or trying to figure out why terrorist want to kill innocent Americans.
2007-12-19 10:59:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by iamnotme 2
·
6⤊
1⤋
Comparisons in this regard have been made before and President Bush has always held his own ground when comparing academic achievements. You northern lugs mistake a southern drawl for "dumb" as much as people with a strong New York accent are considered "mean". Stereotypes aside, why do you assume she is so intelligent? Since her college days she has done nothing except jack a ride off her husband.
Republicans don't dislike her because she is "intelligent", a case can be proven that a chimpanzee is intelligent also. They dislike her because of her political positions which are considered far left even for Democrats. She represents in essence, a socialist state, from each according to thier worth, to each according to his need. Bigger government, wealth redistribution and socialized healthcare.
She is dangerous given the countries early beginnings and her intent to bring about more government oppression of the people.
2007-12-19 10:57:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
certainly, but not in the matter your implying. she was a PARTCIPATING MEMBER of arguably the least honest and most corrupt administration in history. these are just some of the activities she was involved with bill in.....
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
an uneducated person couldnt have easily sold that type of bill of goods to unsuspecting liberals and earned a pass. the reason why republicans dont like her is lack of honesty ethics and candor.
THE REASON WHY THEY WANT HER TO GET THE NOMINATION IS AGAINST HER A TRAINED MONKEY COULD WIN.
your question has no answer as your premise is both false and ridiculous.
2007-12-19 11:15:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not really and might I say book smart and plain old smart are two very different things. The bottom line for me is will the candidate do things that benefit our country and it's citizens or will they do things that take away from those who work and support this country.What do you think Hillary will do Increase tax or decrease tax? increase welfare or decrease welfare? enforce the laws or let criminals stay? Even if she had all the education in the world, it wouldn't mean it would be used to help AMERICANS or at least the ones who work for their money.
2007-12-19 10:41:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Tea Party Patriot 6
·
8⤊
1⤋