2007-12-19 09:47:22 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I am and I do. He is the only candidate who gives realistic solutions to present problems.
He believes in the constitution and what it stands for!
Your question appears somewhat sexist? what is your point?
2007-12-19 09:59:17 · answer #1 · answered by The Voice of Reason 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he is. Take a look at his work in Congress. He's consistent with his ideals unlike all the others.
Just to mention one thing that shows the kind of man he is. Although he's mainly supported by the libertarians, he talks openly about his ideas on abortion, an issue where his position is against the libertarians (in general). He could easily avoid the issue or just plain lie like anyone else.
And, besides all this, he clearly said that he wants that decision in the hands of the state governments. Even if they rule against his position as president. He understand that the Constitution says that the federal government has nothing to do regulating abortion and he won't use the power of the federal government to enforce his morals to the people.
"he won't use the power of the federal government to enforce his morals to the people", this is what makes Ron Paul believable.
2007-12-19 10:16:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If R. Paul is Ron Paul, then Ron Paul is a wack job and an isolationist. Paul would have the US drop out of the UN and NATO. He would ban the War on Drugs and Gun Control, as if we don't already have enough problems with drug-related crime and kids shooting each other in the streets. Ron Paul would also abolish the Federal Income Tax. Just who does Paul think is going to pay Federal employees, pay for federal programs, maintain our Federal highways and bridges etc?
Not only is Ron Paul a wack job. He's an old wack job who is older than John McCain.
2007-12-19 10:51:50 · answer #3 · answered by John W 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
As a male I dont think he is beleiveable.
I think that he beleives most of what he says, but what he say is not beleivable. Just becuase the person thinks what they say is bleeiveable doesnt make it true.
I do see a difference between him and hilary though. I know hilary doesnt beleive what she says but knows it will get her elected. I think he actually beleives in what he is saying
2007-12-19 09:51:18 · answer #4 · answered by Geoff C 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Not sure what you mean by believable. I 'believe' that he believes in what he is saying. not sure if that answered the question though. So yea I guess he is believable. viable maybe not but believable yea i suppose so.
hehe badkitty was pretty witty there.
2007-12-19 09:50:25 · answer #5 · answered by sociald 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
hehhehe....word! turn it to the left!!!
Oh Ron Paul, yea, I think he's believable, at least as believable as a politician can be.
2007-12-19 09:51:14 · answer #6 · answered by qu1ck80 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
RuPaul?
2007-12-19 09:49:29 · answer #7 · answered by badkitty1969 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋