2007-12-19 08:46:45 · 7 answers · asked by BiologyQuestions 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
In 'most' cases, yes.
There are exceptions - someone brought into an ER in a life-threatening condition, for example, is entitled to immediate care. But other than that, it's a private business arrangement.
Many Doctors, for example, make a moral decision not to provide abortion services. Many will provide contraception to adults, but not to minors.
Richard
2007-12-19 08:49:26 · answer #1 · answered by rickinnocal 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I can think of instances where it is morally acceptable and responsible not to treat. If the patient presents with an illness that requires a specialist, and the physician in question does not have that expertise, he should refer out.
Or, if the treatment has more risk than promise to the patient.
2007-12-19 16:57:40 · answer #2 · answered by Yahoo Answer Angel 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Hippocratic Oath they take requires them to give needed care, but does not mandate they see someone for a routine matter.
2007-12-19 17:10:13 · answer #3 · answered by trooper3316 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Money talks.... I dont know if anyone reads anymore, but there is a great book Godplayer. You will never look at a Dr. the same after you read it.
2007-12-19 20:00:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's a business and no longer has anything to do with morality.
2007-12-19 16:53:44 · answer #5 · answered by Afilado 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I suppose if a corporation can decide whether or not to hire gays and blacks- and that IS unfair. Medicine is becoming corporatized and privatized and it is awful.
2007-12-19 17:47:09 · answer #6 · answered by friend 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, in their offices they can choose, especially if there is a personality issue.
2007-12-19 16:50:47 · answer #7 · answered by ToYou,Too! 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋