I don't recall anybody asking this type of question in WW2, despite tens of thousands of casualties.
2007-12-19 08:32:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
The mission will be accomplished when Israel expands into the Gaza and West Bank, surrounded by nations under the control of the U.S. thereby assuring Israel's security. Though this is the plan, it can't happen. The U.S. is a Christian country in the minds of Muslims and they'll never kowtow to this new Christian Crusade to protect the Holy Land.
Jews consider Jesus to be a fraud. They don't believe the world is coming to an end. They have found a perfect pansy in Christian America, which does believe that the world will end within the next 25 years, and Christians will send their sons and daughters to kill and die in the Middle /East to win favor with God.
It's time to move away from fundamentalist Christian politicians who are working to bring about the Apocalypse.
There won't be an Apocalypse. Only the end of U.S. power and influence in the world, as well as the possible destruction of much of the Middle East including Israel.
2007-12-19 08:28:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by CaesarLives 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
no longer worry-free question, in a fashion of talking, definite. united statesa. the country supposedly got down to acheive an purpose, and failed. A failure is a defeat. although we could continuously ask ourselves, grow to be the project achevable contained in the 1st place? have been we even there for what the administration and the media instructed us we've been there for? grow to be it a mistake from the beginning up? although solid the intentions of the administration have been, it quite is glaring Iraq is in a civil conflict. No volume of yankee troops will make the two factors decide to get alongside. they are going to kill one yet another regardless if we are there or no longer. I say pass away Iraq. It needs to control itself. We purely can't carry their hands continuously, the cost of in basic terms 5 years of this conflict has already bankrupted us, do we hit upon the money for 5 greater? do we stomache greater casualities to fufill an purpose that would by no potential be obtianable? pass away now, pass away in 3 years, the top result's the comparable. All out conflict breaking out and yet another tyrant taking ability, or consistent with possibility no longer, consistent with possibility, purely consistent with possibility, us leaving gets the government of Iraq off their fat asses and actually form a republic. Who is acquainted with, all i be attentive to is, what we are doing now, isn't working.
2016-11-04 01:42:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's only a guess but at least 60,000
So far the 4000 men and women that have given their lives for Bush's War. That has done nothing to open the eyes of Republican Warmongers.
I think the numbers will have to exceed Vietnam before Republicans start wondering if the WMD's will be found.
2007-12-19 08:36:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by whirling W dervish 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
How many more will die before the democrats do what they said they were going to do and bring the troops home? When are they going to cut funding? So far they've failed at every attempt.
2007-12-19 08:30:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It has nothing to do with how many soldiers have lost their lives, and everything to do with finishing the job so that their deaths were not given up for nothing...
2007-12-19 08:27:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by lc 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
Maybe as many as did when Clinton started his illegal war in Kosovo...more Americans died there than Iraq.
2007-12-19 08:38:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by RockHunter 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Your question can only be answered by the Iraqi people since it is them that have not taken complete control of THEIR government yet.
2007-12-19 08:26:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by LadySable 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
26...no wait.....27 yeah ....just 27 more and that's it.
2007-12-19 08:56:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bob 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Stay tuned and you will find out.
2007-12-19 08:30:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
2⤋