Would've been better if they'd included the message he sent to his bit on the side.
2007-12-19 07:20:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gavin T 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
They will sue anybody for anything in the US !! but this serves him right !
The obvious solution would be to say they'd got the name mixed up, or to ask the florist not to disclose his identity or give his true home address, or to buy his wife the same bouquet as his mistress or just to be faithful to his wife...
Why is a mans life SOoooooooo complicated, and they say we women create problems... yer right !!!!
a friend x
Merry Christmas
2007-12-19 07:26:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by CARAMAC 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ha Ha serves him right. How on earth does he think suing the florist will help save his marriage. The guy deserved to be found out.
2007-12-19 12:09:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Magz 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
it could sound unusual, however the undertaking is frequently too little biblical information extremely than too plenty. Take Paul's words in Romans a million case in point. Paul's rationale right it truly is to not describe each and each individual exterior the Abrahamic custom. He says so himself interior the subsequent financial ruin the place he describes people who shop the regulation without understanding it. those, he says, are a regulation unto themselves. yet possibly it truly is in basic terms too precis. if so, seem at Paul's handle on Mars Hill. (Acts 17) He would not start up through condemning his aim audience yet extremely seeks worry-loose floor from which to modern the Christian message. that's the kind i attempt to stick to. the undertaking is that many Christians in basic terms are not interested in such "worldly expertise" and so don't comprehend the thank you to translate their worldview into non-non secular words. element of my ministry is coaching human beings the thank you to try this. even though it is not ordinary, extremely while the wider lifestyle not values philosophy as a manner of drawing near certainty. reducing to the chase, the precious atheist who published those comments is one in all my maximum valued contacts. I easily have benefited a great deal from his insights on my very own questions and had worthwhile discussions with him through way of email. Our hobbies overlap and so it is truly ordinary. He nevertheless thinks i'm incorrect and that's ok. i don't limit my relationships basically to people who believe me. I could confess, although, that this sometimes makes my Christian brethren uneasy. They ask your self approximately my authentic dedication. Oh properly. I sort of like being an anomaly. My faith shows up in the two my words and in my interactions with others. If i'm not culturally Christian adequate, too undesirable. Jesus wasn't the two.
2016-12-11 09:25:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope he got a very high award of damages especially if the bit*hes in the florists did it to be bad. If they were just stupid he shoulfd get a substantial award too.
If he called them fat the judge would send him to jail especially if they are fat and the judge is a fat woman
2007-12-19 12:36:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Paul R 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
First of all, I'd say he deserves it. But that's what happens
when you leave a paper trail! Next time maybe he'll
pay cash!
2007-12-19 07:36:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by doodlebug 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
serves his right, the wazzack! typical to sue the florist though, blame anyone but yourself when you screw up! i hope his wife is divorcing him - for his arrogance! diane.
2007-12-19 20:48:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by diquarry 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dont worry America,us Brits are right behind you,with all these stupid law's,and Brussels just make's it worse,at least you arent tied in with them.
2007-12-19 07:31:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by josephrob2003 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
funny.....sort of like Google Earth, when they were taking the pictures and the cheating husband's car was in the driveway of his mistress.....I'd like to have heard his explanation for that one too!
2007-12-19 07:19:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by abc 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
memo: Don't send flowers to mistress
2007-12-19 07:22:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by scott_v1963 5
·
2⤊
0⤋