They all told us that the White House attorneys "spoke about destorying tapes" with the CIA.
but I think all indications say that the attorneys did in fact speak to the CIA about it, but demanded the tapes to NOT be destroyed.
They only mentioned to the public that the White House attorneys was in on the discussions....isnt it kinda important to let us know that they was on the other side of the table?
another example of the media trying to create news instead of simply reporting it.
2007-12-19 06:45:33 · 2 answers · asked by parrothead 2 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
sorry John...I didnt need you...but Merry Christmas anyway.
2007-12-19 07:28:10 · update #1
re: jurydoc...I usually dont click on links posted in here, but I am glad they are at least acknowledging that it is possible the White House attorneys may have actually been against it instead of for it. It's just wreckless reporting without knowing that info before suggesting otherwise.
If they were for it, we should know it..for sure!...but if they were not for it, its not news at all...they were just doing their jobs.
2007-12-19 08:08:42 · update #2
The NY Times is reporting that there is some confusion about what side the various White House attorneys took.
See:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/19/washington/19cnd-cia.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
2007-12-19 07:36:29 · answer #1 · answered by jurydoc 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like you answered your own question. You need us for what, now?
2007-12-19 06:53:38 · answer #2 · answered by John R 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋