Question of sovereignty or right to self determination?

Question

We the people acknowledged that the world is full of conflicts on many different subjects some are possible to bring solution some are hard to find a right answer.

There are so many organizations who are fighting for sovereignty or right to self determination. The reasons of their struggles are based on historical backgrounds, human rights situation and racial discrimination etc. Some of them use extreme form of violence to achieve their goals and as a consequence civilian casualty are unavoidable. So I have two questions 1. Is sovereignty or right to self determination possible in the present context of today's world? 2. Is violence a means to bring attention of the international community or to achieve their goals?

Answer 1

1 yes it is look at Africa, there are people rising up against their national governments every day, id if the reasons or enemies appeal to a greater nation then they will have very powerful friends helping them either directly or indirectly,

2 i think using violence is a way to remove an oppressor that wont go on their own, can it be a political statement ? sure. will it bring the eyes of many countries to the place of conflict? maybe

but if you are hinting that this is a way to justify terrorism? then i say no, if you are rebelling against a government or army and some civilians are killed, it happens and the innocent lives lost are an accident, as opposed to terrorism that attack the civilians directly, because they lack the moral fiber to attack the power structure of the enemy nation directly

Answer 2

The use of violence, especially against civilians, will only turn the international community against you, regardless of your cause.
The attention you get from the world will be in the form of trying to eliminate you as a threat.

Answer 3

Wilson principle introduced self-determination right in the WWI. then, there could be many sovereignty nation states in Europe. after the WWII, many the middle east countries had earned their sovereignty state. according to some experts, self-determination rights is also imperial tactics as"divide and manage".

if a state is recognized by all states, this state is sovereignty state

Answer 4

i'm no longer a neo-con, i'm a paleo-conservative. i've got self belief in Jesus Christ, Distributism, and basically adequate foreign places intervention to ward off WW3. I on no account voted for Bush and that i could no longer vote for McCain. i will, inspite of the undeniable fact that, be balloting for whoever the GOP candidate for president is in 2012. i desire to point out that the US shape applies to u.s., it does no longer prepare to foreign places powers that could do us harm, or maybe Canada, whether the leaders of their u . s . replaced into duly elected. in case you fairly have self belief that we would desire to constantly no longer combat elected leaders of different international locations, then you definately might might desire to assert our participation in WW2 ecu Theatre replaced right into a travesty on the grounds that Hitler replaced into so duly elected. the US shape is a huge record, taken in context.

Answer 5

Yes, and Yes.