2007-12-19 03:34:35 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's actually ironic how bad the dems want Bush out of office and then they finally get the chance and their choice is between these two incapable people. Haa... good. I don't think either one of the two can handle the job, but if I had to pick. I would say Clinton and my reasoning behind that is even if she is a screw up she always has her husbands help.
2007-12-19 03:54:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Clinton- you will see that those information are distinctive staring on the source it got here from. some instruct Clinton and a few instruct Obama. So, I take those stats with a grain of salt. in my view, i've got self belief Clinton is greater electable. Obama has way too many skeletons that the Republican's won't be able to attend to apply to their benefit.
2016-11-23 15:02:08 · answer #2 · answered by anuj 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm . . . I would say Obama.
With all of Mrs. Clinton's financial backing and organization, to have Obama anywhere near her in the polls indicates serious problems. It reminds me of Mondale and Hart in 1984.
And yes, the Republicans have their share of weaknesses also.
It might be another year when we have to hold our noses and pick the least bad of the alternatives come election day.
2007-12-19 03:48:46 · answer #3 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would say Obama because he is less polarizing. The pundits were wrong before and I believe they are wrong again. Last time they said Kerry was the one and he won the nomination and got beat by the likes of GWB. Had the Democrats ran someone who was actually good I doubt Dubya would have gotten a second term.
2007-12-19 03:45:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Definitely Clinton, Clinton is fiscally conservative and socially liberal (almost moderate). Obama is fiscally and socially more liberal; this is not to say that this is better or worse, in fact, I like Obama very much. However, Hillary is more electable to the plethora of fiscal conservatives that are not religious fanatics.
For instance, who is more electable; huckabee or McCain? Well, I am pretty sure the democratic party would never vote for a creationist like huckabee. on the other hand, McCain is a national hero, very moderate on social issues, and a staunch fiscal conservative--He he won the republican primary, I am sure he would be our next president.
2007-12-19 03:43:38 · answer #5 · answered by bonx 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
If only women are allowed to vote, Hillary is more electable.
Since that's not the case, Obama.
Dems better find a 3rd option fast.
2007-12-19 03:39:42 · answer #6 · answered by Yahoo Answer Angel 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Mr. Obama. I wouldn't trust Ms. Clinton as far as I could throw her.
2007-12-19 03:39:10 · answer #7 · answered by Guessses, A.R.T. 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Clinton out of those two but I would choose Huckabee
2007-12-19 03:44:46 · answer #8 · answered by Hnmgirlygirl 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
He's black well, not african american he's a nother version as a african/american white
She's a she
This country wants a white male christian as president...no matter what's said.
Huck vs Ed possible
2007-12-19 06:48:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Edwards
2007-12-19 03:38:03 · answer #10 · answered by Colonel 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋