This would assume someone like Micheal Moore would be running the country. If such people had been running the country then Japan wouldn't have even needed to attack Pearl Harbor. Why, because they would have dismantled the army,navy and air force to the point it would no longer have been a threat to Japan, or Germany. Japan would have been able to conquer territories in the Pacific knowing that the US wouldn't get involved.
2007-12-20 01:36:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by rz1971 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
So you think FDR was not a lefty. Open a history book and start reading about FDR. He was supported by many lefties in Congress or there would not have been the recovery from the Depression that we had. So what would have happened when Pearl Harbor was bombed did happen because lefties were in control.
2007-12-19 03:12:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
I think they would have done what was necessary. Liberals do not how ever think that the war in Iraq was called for. It was based on lies. They think we should have only went after those responsible for 911. I think we have to clean up the mess we made and at the same time hold those responsible for the mess accountable for their actions.
2007-12-19 03:17:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by RELAX 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
FDR was a liberal leftie so it would be the exact same thing. It was a liberal leftie that dropped the bomb so it would end the same way.
2007-12-19 03:00:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Whats Up Doc 7
·
5⤊
3⤋
ahhh according to the right wing neo-cons FDR was a liberal lefty
who btw developed the first atom bomb and won World War II
it was the pacifistic Republican party that kept US out of WWII earlier when we could have stopped Hitler and Tojo from taking over half the world!
they were true the appeasers (actaully isolationists) of thier time
2007-12-19 03:03:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
4⤋
are you trying to compare Iraq to WWII??? There is no comparison.
Today's "lefties" would take the appropriate action just like they would have taken the appropriate action following 9-11. Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. How many times does this have to be proven.
2007-12-19 03:00:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by truth seeker 7
·
6⤊
3⤋
@ the people claiming FDR was a liberal-
He wasn't. Modern liberalism didn't exist at that time. FDR would disagree with 95% of the democrat platform today. Social security was never intended to become what it is today.
Besides if you claim FDR was a liberal you realize you contradict yourself when you make the "parties switched places" argument right?
2017-04-08 20:20:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Joe H, FDR was pretty liberal, the New Deal was a huge social program that actually worked. He put millions to work building roads, dams, national park buildings, trails, etc. He was also the one to realize that we needed to enter the war and he did a good job dealing with it, too. Thanks for asking...
2007-12-19 03:11:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by slykitty62 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
The same thing that happened the first time. Democrats won the war and saved the world.
2007-12-19 03:09:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Are you joking?
FDR was the ultimate liberal lefty with the New Deal and Social Security.
2007-12-19 03:01:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
4⤋