Simple question. And a good one too. Given where we
are right now. From Iraq, to Halliburton. Or Haliburton
which ever it is. Well would you ? Don't be scared.
And tell us why. Best answer wins. ~~~
2007-12-19 02:47:32 · 52 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hey Zodiac Man does it again.
Great answers. But it is obvious,
the Democrats will be back in
the chair once again. Life is good....
Case closed.
2007-12-19 02:59:15 · update #1
Katy D. Come back to Earth.
2007-12-19 03:18:16 · update #2
HE** NO!!!!!!!! DON'T YOU KNOW HE IS SLOWLY DESTROYING ARE PLANET!!!!!!! PEOPLE THAT VOTE FOR HIM ARE F***ED IN THE BRAIN PERMINITLY!!!!!
my advice is to NOT VOTE!!!!!
2007-12-19 02:52:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
I probably would. The reason being is we don't know what would have happened if we had voted for anyone else. Many people lament all the bad things that happen during his presidency and are not seeing the positives. I attribute this to the media- at least during the earlier stages of the war. They're starting to come around (I hope) but there were times when I felt so bombarded by obvious Demo slanted news that I felt the terrorists must have been lining the pockets of newspaper editors. I think the most important thing that we must combat are the fanatics, because they are like a cancer that will spread. And Bush has been focused on that. HOwever, it does suck that the housing market and other things are dogging this presidency.
2007-12-19 02:56:18 · answer #2 · answered by chamcham 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I would vote for anyone other than "wood-head" Kerry (his brain is "seared" with the made-up memory of Christmas in Cambodia) or "hypocrite" Gore (any bets on what his heating bill is this month?).
I hate to tell you this, but we are winning in Iraq. Good news for America is bad news for Democrats, I guess. We have had no further terrorist attacks on U.S. soil since 9/11. So, what is your problem again? Oh yeah, Halliburton.
A quick check into the facts (please don't get your news from the comedians). Cheney doesn't gain a penny from Halliburton's contracts, and almost certainly won't lose even if Halliburton goes bankrupt. All of the money Cheney earned from Halliburton was when he was the company's chief executive, before he was a candidate for Vice President. Why do you begrudge him his paycheck? (At least he did earn it, unlike Kennedy and Kerry -- ouch.)
I guess blind hatred can cloud anyone's ability to use reason.
How's that answer? Not what you wanted to hear, but it's the truth. Well, try to let go of your anger, give me a "thumbs down" if you need to, and have a great "Winter Solstice", O.K.?
2007-12-19 03:11:38 · answer #3 · answered by Katy D 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I did not vote for bush and i sure would not vote 4 him. NEVER PUT AN OIL MAN IN OFFICE. This country has went down hill so bad the last 7 years it will take 20 years to dig R self out.One thing he said he will be the longest president in war that was the only true thing he has ever said.If we took all the liers and thieves out of the white we would have to replace every one...
2007-12-19 03:11:13 · answer #4 · answered by gingercs 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're looking a some undesirable issues... and not stating any of the solid. Our financial device is magnificent. The inventory industry purely hit an all time severe. Unemployment is low. practise is recuperating. united statesa. is starting to be greater advantageous in technologies and in scientific exploration and progression. college enrollment is at an all time severe... What are you basing the undesirable financial device on... purely the cost of gasoline? all human beings continues to be traveling, and greater advantageous than ever, so it has no longer slowed human beings down too lots.
2016-11-04 01:08:27 · answer #5 · answered by chatan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yup. First of all,I can't even remember who the Dems run anymore. They're straight out of Big Top Circus. I'd have liked Bush to have been tougher on illegals. Oh and btw,George Soros owns 1.9 million shares of Halliburton. Clinton used Halliburton in Bosnia.
2007-12-19 02:51:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
Given who is running now? In a New York minute.
2007-12-19 03:39:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not unless he were running against Rosie O'Donnell.
Seriously, He's not very smart, not a good leader, he has the country headed in a bad direction and he just gives me bad feelings.
2007-12-19 03:02:27 · answer #8 · answered by Joe Angus 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, given the candidates on the left, he'd be better than any of them! A vote for Hillary, Obama or Edwards is disaster in the making what with their socialistic views. We'd be better off with Ron Paul over the aforementioned.
2007-12-19 02:52:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Sure I would vote for him.....if the vote was to nominate the world's stupidest person.
Doesnt really matter what votes anyone makes since he cheated his way in to power by illegally changing the laws regarding recounts during the last election process.
George W has one redeeming feature only.....he is mortal!!
2007-12-19 02:53:24 · answer #10 · answered by Big Dave 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes, i would vote for him, u cant really blame him for the troops, what was he supposed to do, if we dont invade them maybe they would have invaded us, and he also did come to be president at a hard time. 1st year went well then the war started. No one likes a President that had to deal with a war. And id say he did a good job.
2007-12-19 02:52:34 · answer #11 · answered by Matt V 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋