2007-12-19 02:13:45 · 42 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Regardless of weather you are pro-or anti-death penalty,I think all can agree;if the death penalty exists FOR anyone,it exists for the exactly the evil,deviant monster you are describing.I personally believe that once you go past a certain point,you relinquish your' membership as a member of the human race,and,therefore,shouldn't be treated as human.Is there any question of what to do with a dog that turns mean and starts attacking people?Same difference.
2007-12-19 07:16:11 · answer #1 · answered by M 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If need be, definitely yes. Another option would be castration but then they would probably turn to killers. So the death penalty would be the answer. People seem to forget about the feelings of the victims and their families. The problem with leaving them in prison is taxpayers money, prisons today are like country clubs or health spas. That doesn't seem like punishment to me. Yes, they are with the general prison population & I'm sure some day , they will be killed in a not so nice way. But again, why should we pay to keep them living very comfortable? Just doesn't make any sense to me.
2007-12-19 02:43:43 · answer #2 · answered by PJ ~88~ FAN 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes very appropriate. They hurt and ruin so many lives, yet through so called humanitarians we keep releasing them just so they can continue. In prisons here the child molesters have pictures of their victims and boast about em, its very sickening
2007-12-19 02:23:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Molesters, yes, yes, yes!!! They can not be rehabilitated. Kinda iffy on rapist, depending on the level of sadistiveness and weather or not they are a good candidate for rehab. would differentiate between death and life.
2007-12-19 02:21:57 · answer #4 · answered by ~ luv sis 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
'yessss in a word.And a word is enough for the wise.Life has a purpose, a role in the scheme of things.Education,formal or informal,trains us to discover our role and to do that role.This makes the world a better place to live in.Rapists and child molesters have no right to exist amongst human beings.They must be killed like maddogs without delay.says the rishi-Yesham na vidya, na tapo ,na danam,na gyanam,na sheelam,na guno,na dharma,te mrityuloke bhavabhar bhootah,manushyaroopen mrigashcharanti(sanskrit sloka)
2007-12-19 02:45:46 · answer #5 · answered by chillyoung 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No that is an easy way out. First is to cut their genitals then lock them up for life without any chance of parole and let them suffer inside jail until their death.
2007-12-19 04:05:45 · answer #6 · answered by ojiban 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why does it only have to be for habitual offenders. If you touch a child you should be castrated and left to suffer for a few hours, then shot!
2007-12-19 02:26:33 · answer #7 · answered by Slapshot27 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
We had one right here near us that raped these young girls and tied them up and dumped them out and he did this to a lot of girls for a very long time.
Personally they could use the Bobbitt method on them, and then shove them in Prison with a Bunch of those big husky Prison Guys who need a Girl-Friend. I hate to support them with our tax money the rest of their life but this would be a good punishment for them-
2007-12-19 02:26:05 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If he were killing his victims, "YES!" All rapists & child molesters should have a mandatory sentence of nuturing! Yank the balls, tame the kitty!
2007-12-19 04:10:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I do not think that would be an appropriate punishment. Castration however would be the preferred alternative also excise the prostate gland.
2007-12-19 05:34:09 · answer #10 · answered by robert s 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋