Ok now that the Mitchell report has brought everyone skeletons’ out of the closet, why should we give the rocket the benefit of the doubt? Not any has giving Barry the benefit of the doubt
2007-12-19 01:56:31 · 13 answers · asked by GatorBowler 3 in Sports ➔ Baseball
The evidence is against him. I say git-a-rope!
2007-12-19 02:01:11 · answer #1 · answered by pricehillsaint 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Clemens is most likely a liar. As far as Barry Bonds is concerned. He's been given the benefit of the doubt by MLB. He hasn't been suspended for anything unlike a number of other players, white, black or otherwise.
Bonds is just as lucky as Clemens, he's just more of a jerk to the media.
2007-12-19 10:27:56 · answer #2 · answered by kenrayf 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
the Mitchell report has 8 pages on him. his trainer has specific times when he used the drugs. yeah he's a liar.
the reason Bonds never got the benefit of the doubt is because he isnt a "nice guy." the media has hated him since he was in college. so it was easy to write negative things about him when the steroid allegations came up. the media and the people love Clemens so theyre are wishing the Mitchell report is wrong about him
2007-12-19 12:32:22 · answer #3 · answered by whatshappenin? 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
My opinion is that most of these players were using steroids. After the public becoming aware of this, then the players switched to HGH and other supplements. Look at McGwire I believe he used steroids then let the public see that he was using ANDRO to throw off the steroid issue. These players are guilty.
2007-12-19 11:00:59 · answer #4 · answered by rikirailrd 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We won't know until we hear his side of the story and the complete truth becomes known. Right now I would say that it doesn't look good for Roger. If it looks like a duck, if it waddles like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, it must be a duck.
2007-12-19 10:22:31 · answer #5 · answered by Frizzer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It certainly doesn't look good for Clemens, but the "evidence" presented in the Mitchell report is uncorroborated testimony. Nothing hard; quite flimsy. Doesn't mean it is wrong, but is IS flimsy.
2007-12-19 10:41:21 · answer #6 · answered by Chipmaker Authentic 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Take a look at the two links below - one is for the Rocket as a rookie and one for this past year- You be the judge - - -
I think maybe he's stretching the truth a bit.
2007-12-19 10:09:44 · answer #7 · answered by auntielibrarian 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't believe either of them. Roger should be treated the same as Barry. They should drag him before congress.
2007-12-19 12:11:23 · answer #8 · answered by Carnac 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think he is lying. He is just making matters a million times worse for himself.
2007-12-19 10:23:57 · answer #9 · answered by Bazinga! 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Its a white lie
2007-12-19 10:06:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋