Is it better to have loved and lost, or to have never have loved at all? Why?
2007-12-19 00:54:43 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Other - Family & Relationships
oh i don't even know. if you've loved and lost, you're miserable remembering everything and what could have been but if you never loved at all there's nothing to reminisce about and you're still thinking of what could've been.
i'd say it's better to have loved and still be loving.
2007-12-19 11:43:32 · answer #1 · answered by Claudia 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is better to have loved and lost because at least you know you are alive that way.
Merry Christmas
2007-12-19 01:09:15 · answer #2 · answered by box of rain 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
loved and lost.
to never had love is sad.at least if you had it and lost it,you know what it feels like.and you can reminisce on the good times.but to never have loved means you can only imagine what love feels like.that is sad.
2007-12-19 03:34:44 · answer #3 · answered by mojo569 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Loved and lost.
If you never loved at all then you never experienced it and would always be protecting yourself, and never enjoying it, even if the outcome doesn't turn out well.
2007-12-19 01:03:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋