2007-12-17 22:10:54 · 22 answers · asked by mumtaz 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
We could not afford the registration fee!
2007-12-17 22:14:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Britons could be allowed to vote in American Presidential elections,in spite of each and every thing,u.s. dictates British foriegn coverage,and characteristic the criminal suitable to have British voters arrested & taken to u.s., without recourse to British courts.Bush treats Blair like some small-city Mayor,no admire for the country Blair governs.
2016-11-03 22:40:24 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was aleady set up before Tony Blair cane into the picture.
If you look carefully, it started in Maggie Thatchers time, and the way our governments have come into line for the US since that time, makes me think they have some sort of hold over this country. ( Blackmail ?? )
2007-12-17 22:28:57 · answer #3 · answered by John W 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Richie
There are not "four countries named Great Britain". There are three countries named Great Britain (England, Wales, Scotland). In the United Kingdom there are four countries (England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland).
2007-12-17 22:20:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It pretty much has. Look at what the kids "Blair's Children" (they know nothing but New Labour) are now wearing and speaking like.
2007-12-17 22:15:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
many reasons. united states was not looking for a 51st state. united kingdom was not looking to become a state in the union. even if the government of the uk had decided that this was desirable they would have had to put it in their election manifesto, get elected with a mandate to do that, debate it in parliament and then there would be loads of legal stuff to consider. they would also have to deal with the political fall out. i for one would be violently against it and take to the streets in protest ( bet i wouldn't be the only one ).
2007-12-17 22:16:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Puerto Rico is next in line. England has not yet adopted 'press 2 for Spanish'.
2007-12-17 22:15:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not for want of trying on Blairs part!
2007-12-18 08:19:10 · answer #8 · answered by stuartie74 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It pretty much did, as the Blair puppet sat on Bush's lap and copied every move that his master initiated.
2007-12-17 22:14:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
American aircraft carriers at permanent anchor off the coast of Western Europe can't become States.
2007-12-18 23:00:54 · answer #10 · answered by Pit Bull 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because Blair ruled 4 countries named Great Britain... which funnily enough has been around a lot longer than USA and has a stronger economy currently!
2007-12-17 22:14:58 · answer #11 · answered by Richie DC 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋