i'm happened to view an analysis about the Dictators who took over the country from the democtric rulers. The senior press analysiser pointedout that no Dictators involved in corruption while they are ruling the country. They never misused govt tresury for their personal use. They never brought their kith and kin or atleast tried to bring to power etc., i remember not the channel but remember his answer to a question. The elected representatives who occupies power posts involved in corruption that we see in dailies..but we cry the dictators to let way for democratic path only and no one pointed out about their corruption, since there is no corruption in their one man rule. for example , the senior man said in pakistan from Ayubkahan to Mushaaraf, they never caught of corruption.. is it correct? Is there any substance in the pressman's view?
2007-12-17 21:50:23 · 4 answers · asked by Tamil from Vellore 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Press ppl hardly find time to collect information about their corruptions in spite they r always busy finding faults regarding their dictatorship which is one of the big corruption committed by Ayubkhan to Musharraf. Press ppl give their view , u r there to judge correctness or others wise.
2007-12-17 22:31:14 · answer #1 · answered by nazbak 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You have to take into consideration the fact that said dictator can do whatever he/ she wants to said media. I believe the only media to accuse their ruling govt. of corruption and NOT get shut down is our own.
2007-12-18 06:00:33 · answer #2 · answered by glennthomaswright 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why else would they become Dictators. Hussein, built and built everything to himself. Would you say Hitler, was a great
person? They steal everything and the people starve.
2007-12-18 06:05:34 · answer #3 · answered by Bob Dylan ♪ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dictator means corruption
2007-12-18 06:56:56 · answer #4 · answered by frank 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋