Well as I see it, both situations are horrible nightmares, yet both are different situations.
The victim's of Sept. 11-2001, were born and had families of there own, friends and careers. They had lives.
Aborted babies never even get the opportunity to take a breath. They were murdered in the name of pro-CHOICE, the unborn were never given a choice!
2007-12-17 22:14:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Cheryl 5
·
3⤊
4⤋
I think roe vs wade is worse it really destroyed our country forever we have killed over 49 million babies since 1973. Our country has never been the same since if we say its ok to kill a baby then what we going to do when a child is born, to a human being very sad we try to take God out of this country. see I am pre life. January 22 2008 is something I not happy about remember but it happened because of the government.
now lets talk about sept 11 can all you remember what you were doing but the thing is to kill 3,000 people and on top go to war. This war has nothing to do with 911 so its time we wake up and realize that Bush just does not know what he doing. What can we do is pray.
2007-12-18 18:24:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mary Guernsey 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would be Dec 12, 2000.
Sept 11, 2001 was just the second shoe to drop. As a result of the most contentious SCOTUS decision ever, that even they would not support. It is that day the future historians will mark as the end of civilization and the rise of the Fascist States across the world (if there still Are Historians)
2600 actual humans (with actual minds!) were killed in attack on Sept 11, 2001, and another 3400 imaginary humans added to hype the fear, so they could pass the enabling acts for a dictatorship that had already begun to break the laws on illegal wiretapping six months BEFORE!
As a result 4000 actual American Soldiers, and perhaps another 2000 NOLA residents have died in easily countable ways, with many millions in less countable ways, to say nothing of the hundreds of millions who have had their lives ruined so a few thousand could become ridiculously rich.
THAT is the callous narrow selfish Political Agenda that not only killed, and even tortured, innocent bystanders by the millions, but threatens to make every outrage and brutality pale by comparison to the Mass Murders of actual people that are planned.
A big part of the conspiracy involves getting folk worked up in a hundred ways, from the "deaths" of not yet humans (no place for a mind yet), to gays, illegals, commies, terraists, "darwinists" etc like a bunch of cowboys herding cattle.
2007-12-18 06:12:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Freedem 3
·
3⤊
5⤋
Well judging by sheer numbers it would have to be Roe v Wade. Not only is it disturbing on the humanity side, but this is the first instance I can remember where the Supremem Court essentially acted as the legislative branch of government. Anybody have any statistics on the number of abortions performed in the last 35 years in the US? The world? That would be interesting...
2007-12-18 05:46:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jennifer H 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
Wow, that really puts things into perspective. I think I would lean toward Roe v Wade. Sad.
2007-12-19 00:48:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both dates are infamous. But thankfully the Roe v Wade decision is close to being overturned because of bad constitutional law from the git go.
As for 911, we must also remember 311, and 711, and Bali, and the USS Cole, and the American Embassy in Iran(from the 70's) and a bunch of other outrageous and infamous acts by the terrorists.
I Cr 13;8a
Ps 122;6
Ps 92;1
2007-12-18 05:32:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 7
·
6⤊
3⤋
I WOULD HAVE TO SAY 9/11. ROE V WADE WAS A WRONG DECISION, BUT IT IS SOMETIMES NECESSARY TO HAVE AN ABORTION. THOSE CASES SHOULD BE LIMITED TO RAPE INCEST & THE HEALTH OF THE MOTHER.
2007-12-18 13:34:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they are in 2 different catagories.
but roe vs. wade should be overturned, at least the law of abortion should be different
that law leaves too much power in a womans hands, not only does it give he the right to take a childs life, but she also kills a son/daughter of the Father of that baby.
the father has no rights at all if the child should live, but he sure is obligated to pay support if the mother decides to have a kid and seperate from him.
2007-12-18 05:13:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by mister_anonymous1970 2
·
5⤊
3⤋
You are correct. On that date, genocide became a reality in the US.
2007-12-18 23:18:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by iraqisax 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sept. 11, because that date symbolizes and reminds us of the constant threat by foreign powers to end your freedom to protest Roe v. Wade.
2007-12-18 05:15:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋